I don't know I was hopeing you can tell me
AnswerNo, Morocco is a developing Country, which means it has not been developed yet.
No it has the 4th largest Economy in the world.The Mumbai Skyscrapers and the New Delhi Airport, Metro,Roads and stadiums also tells us a part of the story!India has economy of $1.72 Trillion.So it will be a very developed country soon!
Libya is a developed country and not a developing country. It is considered as the most developed country in Africa because of the oil that is produced. So many countries in the world depend on Libyan oil for example America gets about 90,000 barrels of oil per day and uses about 20 million dollars per year. Libya is also an OPEC member (Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries). This organization has been widely criticized because most oil-rich countries the determine the prices and oil production. Libya is also ranked number 5 most developed country in Africa on 2007 and number 81 globally because of its oil sector.
Generally speaking the term "third world country" has been replaced in economic parlance as a "developing country". Developing can mean increasing agriculture production to help feed its people or even having some type of farm product available for export. In the case of developing nations we may normally see efforts of some people to relocate to wealthier nations. Once again, in general terms a developing nation is a poor nation. An industrialized nation has factories to produce products for internal use and for export. Generally speaking, if a nation has developed an industrial base it also has farmlands. Normally an industrialized nation has a majority of its population above the poverty level.
so bcoz its government has not been able to secure the minimum needs(food shelter healthcare) for all of its citizens .its right now trying to do so . thats why its a developing country like others as India, china, Brazil.............etc
There had been many thoughts about this but it was realised that its a developing country due to the facts that its still recovering from apartheid just managing with resources slowly creating better ways to enhance environment and the lives of people The End
No, it has been owned by the Dutch and the English
South Africa is a signatory to the Kyoto Protocol, which sets binding emission reduction targets for developed countries. South Africa has committed to reducing its greenhouse gas emissions below business-as-usual levels, but as a developing country, it does not have binding targets like developed countries. South Africa has also been involved in negotiations to shape future international climate agreements post-Kyoto.
There was no change to the name of the country after 1994. The official name is the Republic of South Africa and it has been named this since 1961.
No . Please, I urge you to look up Europe and Africa on a map, in an atlas, or on Google Earth to see the relationship between them.
south Africa has never been on drought.
South Africa. An historic moment as this will be the first time it has ever been held in Africa.
The World Cup in 2010 will be held in South Africa, the first time it has been held in the continent of Africa.
South Africa has always been in the same location
The country was called 'The Union of SA' in 1910 by the British, after they combined 4 smaller 'colonies' and republics, which then became the four provinces of South Africa. It then became 'The Republic of South Africa' on 31st May 1961 after a referendum asking the people if they wanted to be free of Britain, the answer was yes! So..... you can say the country has been called South Africa for 97 years!
Nelson did a lot for south africa after getting elected...............did you know that south africa is called the rainbow nation?this title could not have been attained without mandela's efforts :) :) :) :)
No, Zambia has never been part of South Africa.