mine is 105
It can lower their IQ without the money for proper educuation.
The U.S. is ranked at 19, with an IQ of 98.
A great difference is that Wechsler scale doens't calculate your IQ the same way as STanford-binet intelligence scale. 132 iQ (wechsler) => something like 140...in the SBIS scale. You will find a really complete answer by going on best-iq-test (dot) on the title: IQ: IQ Test scales - The Stanford-Binet scale.
There is no relation, no matter how much people say there is. you could be the riches person in the world and your child could be extremely unintelegent same goes the other way, you could have a very low income and give birth to a geneousAnswer I'm sorry to say that the previous answer is not based on current scientific understanding, and is unfortunately incorrect. No matter how much we might wish the world to be otherwise, there are two facts about IQ and income that can't be ignored: (1) Children growing up in well-to-do households are likely to have higher IQs than children growing up in poor households (though there are certainly high IQ children in poor households, and low IQ children in rich households);(2) Adults with higher IQs tend to make more money than adults with lower IQs (though once again, there are dim-witted rich people, and smart poor people). It is important to understand that the above facts do not prove that wealth or money causesuperior intelligence, only that they are related to higher intelligence, possibly through intermediate mechanisms such as genetics and environment.It is known that heredity accounts for about half the variability in IQs, and developmental environment for the other half of IQ variability. From this, it is easy to see that (1) and (2) above are closely related. Not only that, there is good reason to suspect that the relationships in (1) and (2) are self-perpetuating and mutually reinforcing: high IQ adults make more money, and provide heredity and environment favorable to high-IQ children, who then grow up to continue the cycle. It is usually better to deal with the world as it is, rather than as we'd like it to be at some future time. In assuming that there's no connection between income and IQ, we might unwittingly support policies that worsen the IQ-income disparities in our society. On the other hand, if we acknowledge the truth of this connection, then measures that improve the financial resources available to poor children could become more popular, because we suspect that these could help children, and our entire society, become smarter and richer over the long haul.
to much
i think he has an IQ of 273 points or something
idk i think 190 IQ ??
i think -12You give him too much credit.
It is difficult to do so. The IQ does not change much over time.
at least ∞6
A high IQ is much better than a lower one.
Depends how much of it you read
It is not possible to determine Confucius's IQ as IQ measurements were not used during his time. Confucius lived in ancient China (551-479 BC) and IQ testing was developed much later.
IQ is not based upon age. A persons IQ doesn't even change very much through out life, only about 5 IQ points at the most. Therefore asking the IQ of a twelve year old is not a very good question. The average IQ is about 100 though. To find out the exact IQ of a certain person they would have to take an IQ test.
140
There is currently no way to determine an IQ score for an animal of any kind, that is something that is specific to humans.
If you can read and write, you do not have a IQ close to 67. I did not think anyone was still giving IQ tests today, much less telling people their scores. Even in their heyday, the only IQ deemed at all reliable was an individually administered test, given by an expert.. Therefore, I very much doubt that you know your IQ score, but since you ask, the median IQ score is 100--- 67 is very, very low- as as much below normal as a genius is above.