Want this question answered?
Barter is an inefficient means of exchange because
well here is an example. Tamica and Myracle have acontrol over an economy that means an antonym for command economy is dosent have contro
the person you are barteing with could be selling a fake or you could negociate a rip off
The word you may be looking for is "trade" or "barter," perhaps even "exchange."
No. A barter economy is less efficient than the current system. A barter system relies on individuals having a double coincidence of wants where each person wants the exact opposite thing that someone else is willing to sell at that particular time. So, people who needed certain things that weren't on the market were out of luck. Also, the barter economy has a flaw in the indivisibility of products. This means certain large expensive items such as tractors were not able to be divided equally to make necessary exchanges for smaller ticket items. The present money economy makes trade more efficient.
Barter is an inefficient means of exchange because
It has a dictator. That means that it may have a command economy or planned economy or centralized economy (they all mena the same thing).
Barter is a currencyless system, which means goods and srevices were paid by other goods or sevrices. For example traiding 4 cigarettes for a can of beer would be a barter exchange.
well here is an example. Tamica and Myracle have acontrol over an economy that means an antonym for command economy is dosent have contro
the person you are barteing with could be selling a fake or you could negociate a rip off
Barter
India has a commanded economy under the new prime minister. It means the country has economy in its hands.
It was a trade society at that time. Few actually had coin of the realm and barter was the accepted means of exchange.
The word you may be looking for is "trade" or "barter," perhaps even "exchange."
i think its means Rwanda
No. A barter economy is less efficient than the current system. A barter system relies on individuals having a double coincidence of wants where each person wants the exact opposite thing that someone else is willing to sell at that particular time. So, people who needed certain things that weren't on the market were out of luck. Also, the barter economy has a flaw in the indivisibility of products. This means certain large expensive items such as tractors were not able to be divided equally to make necessary exchanges for smaller ticket items. The present money economy makes trade more efficient.
A command economy :)