is economic imbalance is better than nuclear imbalance
There is no Islamic economic system any more than there is a Hindu economic system.
A socioeconomic model tells you more than an economic model does, so in most cases I would say the socioeconomic model is better.
Agriculture of course. P'S Jamaica is better than any other country.
It is an economic advantage for a country to export more than it imports, because this will give it extra money which it can then invest in other countries.
The nuclear energy obtained from uranium or plutonium is the most important alternative to fossil fuels. Oil and methane will be exhausted in less than 100 years. Wind, geothermal, solar, organic wastes etc. are useful but not serious alternative for 10 billions inhabitants.
No cause a nuclear imbalence would destroy thousands of miles and kill people and makes babies that r born all werid and screwed up and it will give people cancer and make animals and plants mutate and a economic imbalence would take a few years to fix a nuclear one would take thousands
nuclear is a type of electricity
There is no Islamic economic system any more than there is a Hindu economic system.
larry did it
Trade imbalance is Aruba's main economic problem.Specifically, Aruba is limited by size and terrain such that the happy island must import. Despite healthy tourism and profitable exports of aloe vera, Aruba must bring in to the country more than it sends out. Correcting that trade imbalance is a priority of Aruba's government.
Schizophrenia is related to a chemical imbalance in the brain, but it has more factors than just the chemical imbalance.
YES......For obvious reasons=biomass is renewable!=
The version I had was βit is better than the old cloudy kindβ ...haha...
Mercantilism
mercantilism
A socioeconomic model tells you more than an economic model does, so in most cases I would say the socioeconomic model is better.
yes it does