the satisfaction a person gets from consumption
The cardinal utility approach also known as classical approach is a measurable utility that expressed an exact unit and measurable monetary terms. In welfare economics if a form of utility program routine is cardinal, interpersonal comparisons of utility differences are allowed.
utility is not constant along the demand curve
it can be expressed in exact unit and is measurable in monetary terms.
When discussing cardinal vs. ordinal, it is helpful to look at what the words mean. The distinguishing factor here is between cardinal and ordinal numbers. Cardinal numbers are 1, 2, 3; ordinal numbers, 1st, 2nd, 3rd. Some crucial differences follow from that. Whereas mathematical operations can be performed on cardinal numbers, they cannot be performed on ordinal numbers. Now, when talking about cardinal utility, it is an attempt to ''measure the utility of various alternatives. When talking about ordinal utility, it is the ''ranking of alternatives.'''' Cardinal utility is, however, an erroneous concept. It is impossible to "measure" utility. People can only say "I prefer A to B", but cannot meaningfully say "I prefer A 2.5 times more than B" or something to that effect. Furthermore, comparisons of utility between different individuals are impossible and meaningless, as well as between the same individual at different points in time (as individuals can and do change their preferences -- that is, ordinal value-scale rankings). Because value is subjective, we cannot measure it and cannot compare between two different people, or even between the same person at different times. To clarify, ordinal utility culminates in value-scales: 1st: A2nd: B3rd: C whereas cardinal utility is the erroneous attempt at measurement: 10utils -- A7utils -- B3utils -- COmar Tawfik.
form utility time utility place utility
The cardinal utility approach also known as classical approach is a measurable utility that expressed an exact unit and measurable monetary terms. In welfare economics if a form of utility program routine is cardinal, interpersonal comparisons of utility differences are allowed.
utility is not constant along the demand curve
it can be expressed in exact unit and is measurable in monetary terms.
The cardinal approach in a careful approach that states that utility is measurable. The ordinal approach disagrees with this theory.
The correct spelling of the adjective, from measure, is measurable (weighable, quantifiable).
If a measurable Force moves a measurable MASS a measurable Distance, then a measurable amount of Work has been done.
Yes.
Measurable data is data that can be measure by a quantity. Measurable data is also known as quantitative data.
When discussing cardinal vs. ordinal, it is helpful to look at what the words mean. The distinguishing factor here is between cardinal and ordinal numbers. Cardinal numbers are 1, 2, 3; ordinal numbers, 1st, 2nd, 3rd. Some crucial differences follow from that. Whereas mathematical operations can be performed on cardinal numbers, they cannot be performed on ordinal numbers. Now, when talking about cardinal utility, it is an attempt to ''measure the utility of various alternatives. When talking about ordinal utility, it is the ''ranking of alternatives.'''' Cardinal utility is, however, an erroneous concept. It is impossible to "measure" utility. People can only say "I prefer A to B", but cannot meaningfully say "I prefer A 2.5 times more than B" or something to that effect. Furthermore, comparisons of utility between different individuals are impossible and meaningless, as well as between the same individual at different points in time (as individuals can and do change their preferences -- that is, ordinal value-scale rankings). Because value is subjective, we cannot measure it and cannot compare between two different people, or even between the same person at different times. To clarify, ordinal utility culminates in value-scales: 1st: A2nd: B3rd: C whereas cardinal utility is the erroneous attempt at measurement: 10utils -- A7utils -- B3utils -- COmar Tawfik.
yes.since this functin is simple .and evry simple function is measurable if and ond only if its domain (in this question one set) is measurable.
The data collected does not have to be measurable.
We need measurable criteria to assess your progress.