the same as the market demand curve.
The supply curve of a pure monopolist is not well-defined like that of a competitive firm because a monopolist sets prices based on demand rather than producing a specific quantity at a given price. Instead of a typical upward-sloping supply curve, a monopolist determines the quantity to produce by equating marginal cost with marginal revenue, and then uses the demand curve to set the price. Consequently, the monopolist's pricing and output decisions are influenced by the market demand, leading to a downward-sloping demand curve rather than a distinct supply curve.
Monopolistic decision-making refers to the choices made by a single firm that dominates a market, where it has significant control over pricing and output levels due to the lack of competition. This firm can set prices above marginal costs, leading to higher profits but potentially reducing consumer welfare. The monopolist also considers factors like demand elasticity and potential regulatory scrutiny when making decisions. Ultimately, these decisions can have broad implications for market efficiency and consumer choice.
In a monopoly, there is no traditional supply function as seen in competitive markets. A monopolist sets the quantity of output to maximize profit by equating marginal cost with marginal revenue, rather than responding to market supply and demand. The monopolist determines the price based on the demand curve for its product, which means the relationship between quantity supplied and price is not direct or linear, making the concept of a supply function less applicable.
A monopolist earns economic profit when the price charged is greater than their average total cost. To maximize profits, monopolies will produce at the output where marginal cost is equal to marginal revenue. To determine the price they will set, they choose the price on the demand curve that corresponds to this level of production.
monopolist's tend to charge? a.Lowe; lower b.higher; lower c.lower; higher d.higher; higher e.higher; the same
The supply curve of a pure monopolist is not well-defined like that of a competitive firm because a monopolist sets prices based on demand rather than producing a specific quantity at a given price. Instead of a typical upward-sloping supply curve, a monopolist determines the quantity to produce by equating marginal cost with marginal revenue, and then uses the demand curve to set the price. Consequently, the monopolist's pricing and output decisions are influenced by the market demand, leading to a downward-sloping demand curve rather than a distinct supply curve.
A monopolist earns economic profit when the price charged is greater than their average total cost. To maximize profits, monopolies will produce at the output where marginal cost is equal to marginal revenue. To determine the price they will set, they choose the price on the demand curve that corresponds to this level of production.
monopolist's tend to charge? a.Lowe; lower b.higher; lower c.lower; higher d.higher; higher e.higher; the same
marginal revenue
marginal revenue
Yes, it is generally inevitable that the monopoly price is higher than the competitive price. In a competitive market, many firms offer similar products, driving prices down to the marginal cost of production. In contrast, a monopolist, being the sole producer, can set prices above marginal cost by restricting output to maximize profit. Graphically, this is illustrated by a downward-sloping demand curve for the monopolist, which shows that as the monopolist raises the price, the quantity demanded decreases, leading to higher prices compared to the horizontal demand curve in perfect competition.
The monopolist's profit maximizing level of output is found by equating its marginal revenue with its marginal cost, which is the same profit maximizing condition that a perfectly competitive firm uses to determine its equilibrium level of output. Indeed, the condition that marginal revenue equal marginal cost is used to determine the profit maximizing level of output of every firm, regardless of the market structure in which the firm is operating.
There are different kinds of markets in different economies/sectors/goods. Accordingly, there are different kinds of output and pricing decisions which take place. Usually, output and pricing decisions are interdependent except for the case of perfectly competitive markets. In perfectly competitive markets, a single firm is so small compared to the market that it cannot affect the prices. In that case, it must take the price as given, and then decide the quantity to be supplied. Price in this market is equal to the marginal cost of production. In monopoly, however, things are different. The monopolist can change the prices, as it is the sole provider of the good and thus has the market power. But here also, if the price increases quantity demanded decreases. Therefore, the monopolist must take under consideration both the positive and negative effects of increase in prices. In another market oligopoly, pricing is a bit more complicated and it depends upon the strategic interaction among the firms.
Yes a monopoly can lose money. If they are caught monopolizing in the US the courts will demand they break up the monopoly causing more companies to be made and more taxes to be brought forth, not including fines for having a monopoly.
Demand = Price = Marginal Cost.
A monopoly typically reduces producer surplus in a market because the monopolist has the power to control prices and restrict output, leading to higher prices and lower quantities produced compared to a competitive market. This results in a transfer of surplus from consumers to the monopolist, reducing overall welfare in the market.
Demand is unit elastic.