Marginal revenue is less than price for a monopolist because in a monopoly market, the monopolist is the sole seller and has the power to set the price. To sell more units, the monopolist must lower the price, which reduces the revenue gained from each additional unit sold. This results in marginal revenue being less than the price.
Price discrimination is based on the idea that each customer has his or her own maximum price he or she will pay for a good. If a monopolist sets the good's price at the highest maximum price of all the buyers in the market, the monopolist will only sell to the one customer willing to pay that much. If the monopolist sets a low price, the monopolist will gain a lot of customers, but the monopolist will lose the profits it could have made from the customers who bought at the low price but were willing to pay more. Price discrimination recognizes that groups of consumers are willing and able to pay different amounts for a good. (gradpoint)
A monopolist is a single seller in the market, while a perfectly competitive firm is one of many sellers. A monopolist has the power to set prices, while a perfectly competitive firm is a price taker and must accept the market price. This difference in market structure leads to monopolists typically charging higher prices and producing less output compared to perfectly competitive firms.
Yes. A monopolist would tend to charge a price closer to fair market value when the demand for a good is elastic. If not demand would be affected. With a monopoly controlled inelastic good the consumer has no recourse and there for would be and the mercy of the supplier.
because the monopolist firms are price maker and they can set any price they want and the customers are not perfect knowleged
Marginal revenue is less than price for a monopolist because in a monopoly market, the monopolist is the sole seller and has the power to set the price. To sell more units, the monopolist must lower the price, which reduces the revenue gained from each additional unit sold. This results in marginal revenue being less than the price.
Price discrimination is based on the idea that each customer has his or her own maximum price he or she will pay for a good. If a monopolist sets the good's price at the highest maximum price of all the buyers in the market, the monopolist will only sell to the one customer willing to pay that much. If the monopolist sets a low price, the monopolist will gain a lot of customers, but the monopolist will lose the profits it could have made from the customers who bought at the low price but were willing to pay more. Price discrimination recognizes that groups of consumers are willing and able to pay different amounts for a good. (gradpoint)
Price discrimination is based on the idea that each customer has his or her own maximum price he or she will pay for a good. If a monopolist sets the good's price at the highest maximum price of all the buyers in the market, the monopolist will only sell to the one customer willing to pay that much. If the monopolist sets a low price, the monopolist will gain a lot of customers, but the monopolist will lose the profits it could have made from the customers who bought at the low price but were willing to pay more. Price discrimination recognizes that groups of consumers are willing and able to pay different amounts for a good. (gradpoint)
A monopolist is a single seller in the market, while a perfectly competitive firm is one of many sellers. A monopolist has the power to set prices, while a perfectly competitive firm is a price taker and must accept the market price. This difference in market structure leads to monopolists typically charging higher prices and producing less output compared to perfectly competitive firms.
Yes. A monopolist would tend to charge a price closer to fair market value when the demand for a good is elastic. If not demand would be affected. With a monopoly controlled inelastic good the consumer has no recourse and there for would be and the mercy of the supplier.
A monopolist must lower its quantity relative to a competitive market to maximize its profits because the monopolist already controls and owns the largest share of the market.
because the monopolist firms are price maker and they can set any price they want and the customers are not perfect knowleged
shift to the left.
A monopolist has more control over pricing because it is the sole provider of a good or service, allowing it to set prices based on its desired profit maximization strategy. In contrast, a perfectly competitive firm is a price taker, meaning it must accept the market price determined by the overall supply and demand. Therefore, it is generally easier for a monopolist to determine price compared to a perfectly competitive firm.
In a monopoly, price is determined by the monopolist's ability to set the price above marginal cost, as there are no direct competitors. The monopolist maximizes profits by producing the quantity of output where marginal revenue equals marginal cost. This typically results in a higher price and lower quantity sold compared to a competitive market, allowing the monopolist to capture consumer surplus as profit. The price is then set on the demand curve at the quantity produced, reflecting the highest price consumers are willing to pay for that quantity.
they decide price and quantity.
No, monopolists are not price takers like competitive firms. In a competitive market, firms accept the market price as given and cannot influence it due to many competitors. In contrast, a monopolist has market power and can set prices above marginal cost, as they are the sole supplier of a good or service, allowing them to influence the market price.