:::econ effects are GREAT! if you don't have to work there or live close (100 miles or so) by...how about Chernobyl? Is that too far away then how about 3 mile island or the love canal. : this wont help u just letting u no isnt Chernobyl a medicine??
Nuclear energy is obtained by the fissioning of nuclei of uranium235, in a controlled chain reaction in a nuclear reactor, which produces heat that can be converted to electricity by normal power plant methods.
it has a high economic value all over the world
123412
1) cotton:- cotton plant gives us cotton 2) rose:- rose is used for making perfumes 3) tea plant:- it gives us tea leaves 4) olive oil :- it is used for making cooking oil 5) apple plant :- it provides us apple 6) coffee plant :- it is used for making coffee powder
See the attached link below for a survey of the economics of nuclear power
If a nuclear power plant explodes, potential consequences include widespread radiation exposure, environmental contamination, long-term health effects, displacement of populations, and economic impacts due to cleanup and recovery efforts.
Yes, I strongly agree.
because its having a meltdown at the moment
I believe this was built but never fuelled or operated. Therefore it can have had no effects, and won't unless it is put into service.
simply, the nuclear reactor is the source of heat (or steam) for the nuclear power plant.
what is the existing of nuclear power plant?
Chernobyl was a Nuclear Power Plant.
what is negative of the nuclear power plant
Nuclear Fallout comes from a nuclear power plant.
No. There is no possibility whatsoever of a nuclear power plant having a nuclear explosion. It is not physically, or even theoretically, possible for the core to be brought into a super-prompt critical geometry and held there long enough to consume enough fuel to "go nuclear".
D. A Wesley has written: 'Seismic structural fragility investigation for the Zion Nuclear Power Plant' -- subject(s): Earthquake effects, Nuclear power plants
Ågesta Nuclear Plant ended in 1974.