A positivist approach to research emphasizes the use of empirical, observable evidence and objective measurement to understand social phenomena. It relies on quantitative methods, such as experiments and surveys, to test hypotheses and establish generalizable laws. Positivism asserts that knowledge should be derived from scientific methods, minimizing subjective interpretation and focusing on facts that can be verified through observation. This approach is rooted in the belief that reality is stable and can be understood through systematic study.
Interpretive approach is an approach someone uses when they are doing research.
The nomothetic approach to research focuses on identifying general laws and principles that apply across various cases, emphasizing quantitative methods and statistical analysis. It seeks to establish broad patterns or trends by studying large samples, allowing researchers to make predictions and generalizations. This approach contrasts with the idiographic approach, which emphasizes detailed, qualitative analysis of individual cases. Nomothetic research is often used in fields such as psychology, sociology, and the natural sciences.
Commodity = needs Product = quality In my POV, the commodity approach merely focuses on the consumers' demands whilst the product approach focuses on bringing consumer demand by creating a product that's of great quality.
The HighScope learning approach was developed in Ypsilanti, Michigan in the 1960's. Over time the program has evolved to incorporate modern research on brain development and cognitive ability.
Business concerns significantly influenced Thomas Edison's research by driving him to prioritize inventions with commercial potential. He often focused on developing products that could be quickly patented and sold, such as the phonograph and the electric light bulb. Edison's approach to research was also shaped by the need to attract investors and secure funding, which led him to establish the first industrial research laboratory. This commercialization of innovation not only advanced his inventions but also set a precedent for the relationship between business and scientific research.
Post-positivist research is a theoretical approach to research that challenges the strict empiricism and objectivity of positivism. It acknowledges that researchers cannot be completely objective and that facts are influenced by the researcher's perspective and context. Post-positivism allows for a more flexible and interpretive approach to understanding phenomena.
Quantitative research is associated with positivist/postpositivist paradigm. Qualitative research is the approach usually associated with the social constructive paradigm. The pragmatic approach or mixed methods use methods which appear best suited to the research problem.
Positivist inquiry is a research approach grounded in the philosophy of positivism, which asserts that knowledge should be derived from empirical evidence and observable phenomena. It emphasizes the use of scientific methods, including experiments, surveys, and statistical analysis, to uncover objective truths about social and natural phenomena. This approach typically values quantitative data and seeks to establish causal relationships, often prioritizing generalizability and replicability in findings. Overall, positivist inquiry aims to contribute to a systematic understanding of the world through rigorous, evidence-based investigation.
Cesare Lombroso is considered the father of the biological approach within the positivist school of criminology. Lombroso believed that criminal behavior was determined by biological factors and that he could identify criminals by physical characteristics.
First I would like to refer this issue to epistemology and methodology , which the epistemology is the philosophy of knowledge or of how we come to know and the Methodology is also concerned with how we come to know, but is much more practical in nature.In inference, I can put it in a short way that, the Positivist is the knowledge of realists to uncover the truth in a proved way and the Post-Positivist is the knowledge which is more concerned with critical realistic way.
Post-positivist psychology challenges the traditional positivist view by recognizing the limitations of objectivity and proposing that scientific inquiry should consider subjective experiences and social context. It emphasizes the importance of understanding the complexity of human behavior and the role of interpretation and multiple perspectives in psychological research.
Positivist calendar was created in 1849.
To determine if you are a positivist or a post-positivist, consider your views on knowledge and reality. Positivists typically believe that knowledge is derived from observable phenomena and emphasize empirical evidence, while post-positivists acknowledge that our understanding of reality is inherently fallible and shaped by social contexts. If you believe in the possibility of objective truth through scientific methods, you may lean towards positivism; if you recognize the limitations and biases in knowledge, you might identify as a post-positivist. Reflecting on how you approach evidence and the nature of truth can help clarify your stance.
That would be a positivist approach, using numerical, quantitative data - scientific The unscientific would be the opposite.
The positivist school of criminology embraced a scientific approach to understanding crime, focusing on biological, psychological, and social factors that contribute to criminal behavior. They believed that individuals were not solely responsible for their actions and that factors beyond their control could influence criminal behavior. Positivist criminologists advocated for rehabilitation and treatment rather than punishment for criminals.
Positivist thinking refers to a philosophical approach that emphasizes empirical evidence and scientific methods as the most reliable sources of knowledge. It seeks to understand the world through observation, experimentation, and measurement, and often rejects metaphysical or subjective explanations in favor of objectivity and verifiability.
The four approaches to research are quantitative research, qualitative research, mixed-methods research, and action research. Each approach has its own strengths and weaknesses, and researchers choose the approach based on their research questions and objectives.