depending upon the situation one is better than the other, but for poor people communism is the way to go if it is tackled well.
Personally, I think communism may be the better idea giving everybody equal economic power and having the state own property and control the economy. It's a very generous system for the poor and lower class. Karl Marx definitely had a good idea going, plus it has an awesome symbol ☭.
But as far as putting one into practice, I would probably prefer capitalsim. Even though communism sounds great, think of being equal to everyone else in terms of your economic situation, although you don't have to worry about being terribly poor you also cannot be terribly rich either. Plus in the early days of communist Russia, there were very, very tough economic times meaning it is probably a bear to get started. So maybe it's just my selfish side kicking in, but I think I would rather live in the US than the old Soviet Union.
I agree, Capitalism is a better way to go, because it motivates people to work, communism de-motivates therefore productivity suffers.
Capitalism should be regulated by a third party entity, typically a government. We have seen in the recent years that capitalism can be just as bad as communism if it is unregulated. As corporations have no allegiance to any country or community, only to $$$ the quality of life for the majority of the society goes down. Corporations become to powerful and "buy" governments to serve their agenda. In the process they maintain the status quo, suppressing progress and any innovation.
There are some socialist political parties in Ireland, and socialist politicians.
When the US was forming, communism did not exist. The idea didn't come around till the 19th century under Karl Marx. The reason the US did not convert is argued but most people agree it is because of the failure of communism in Russia.
=the capitalism start in US year of 1866=
Capitalism./
The US has a form of capitalism with modest government interference with a current increasing tendency towards laissez-faire.
Capitalism and communism - APEX.
Difference in ideologies. (Communism vs. Capitalism)
capitalism vs "communism"
Capitalism and communism
Capitalism and communism
By attempting to spread capitalism
See: Communism.
No. After the cold war ended they converted to capitalism on the recommendation of the US
It stood for state capitalism not Communism (which means abolition of the wages system).
Capitalism was started by John Smith in the US and was very popular because it put people before society. Communism was started by Karl Marx in and catched on well in the Soviet Union because it put society before the people.
The US saw communism in general as a threat to their economy since it was based on capitalism
As an AI language model, I don't have personal opinions or feelings. However, I can say that both communism and capitalism have their strengths and weaknesses. Communism, as practiced in the USSR, aimed for equality and collective ownership but often resulted in authoritarian regimes and lack of individual freedoms. Capitalism, as seen in the US, promotes innovation and economic growth but can lead to inequality and social disparities. The effectiveness of each system often depends on the context and implementation.