England viewed its North American colonies as an economic resource, colonies provided raw materials, made products out of it, and sold it back for a higher price go make a profit.
England believed that the colonies were set up for the benefit of England all the products produced in the colonies should go to the mother country (England) were the products would then be sold back to the colonies for really high prices.
Mercantilism guided the British to view the New World as a place filled with raw materials. They expected the American colonies to serve their mother country by collecting these materials and giving/trading it with it's mother country as well as it's sister countries.
The difference between liberalism and mercantilism is economics driving politics v.s. politics driving economics. The liberals view of economics and politics as discrete, and very different. Mercantilists grant primacy through politics within the exclusion of all else. That's the real difference--ideological, not economical.
Mercantilism was the economic philosophy underlying early European colonial policy. The object of mercantilism was to increase the wealth of the Mother Country (England) in gold and silver. To accomplish that goal, a favorable balance of trade was desired. That means that a nation would sell more than it would purchase, thus creating a surplus in the treasury. The name of the philosophy points out the importance of merchants in this policy. Merchants would sell products to foreign nations and purchased items to be sold within the nation. Theorists using this model tended to view the market as a pie that was up for grabs. Wealth was always gained at the expense of other nations. For some, the ideal was to become self-sufficient. The nation would produce everything its people needed and buy nothing from foreign nations -- thus the idea of the trade deficit. Since the ideal could not be accomplished in the real world of economics, the object of mercantilism was to minimize imports that cost money and maximize exports and the trade that brought money in to the nation.
In his book called the Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith analyzes and explains his view of economics and what system may be the best one to implement into a nation's economic policies. Smith came to the conclusion that Mercantilism was unsound. He recommended a capitalistic system, a laissez-faire system.
England believed that the colonies were set up for the benefit of England all the products produced in the colonies should go to the mother country (England) were the products would then be sold back to the colonies for really high prices.
Mercantilism guided the British to view the New World as a place filled with raw materials. They expected the American colonies to serve their mother country by collecting these materials and giving/trading it with it's mother country as well as it's sister countries.
savage and dirty
economic resource
The British view that the colonies were to be used and exploited
There are a few thinks that attract people to the colonies. It can be anywhere from the view to the pricing.
The colonies should take more responsibility for their own defense.
They hated them and believed that they were commiting treason.
The colonies should take more responsibility for their own defense.
The colonies should take more responsibility for their own defense.
The colonies should take more responsibility for their own defense.
because they just did!