Augustus at the turn of the milennium foresaw the problem, and set about stabilising the borders on the defensible Rhine-Danube line, and in the Middle East and North Africa he worked on diplomacy.
Instability in the empire started with internal struggles for leadership. Then the successive migration westwards of Goths, Vandals, Huns, etc created problems of defence, then absorption, which delayed but did not overcome the eventual collapse of the western part of the empire, which ceased to have an emperor after 476 CE. The Empire lived on in the east centered on Constantinople, shrinking until captured by the Turks in 1453 CE.
While the internal turmoil between contestants for the emperorship was a destabilising factor, the basic fact is that the borders were simply too long and open to be defended against the hordes from the east which kept pouring in.
One factor that did not cause America to experience an economic boom after the war was a decline in consumer spending. In fact, consumer spending surged due to increased disposable income, pent-up demand during the war, and the availability of credit. Additionally, the post-war period saw a significant rise in industrial production and technological advancements, which fueled economic growth rather than hindering it.
The decline of Spain's economy can be attributed to several factors, including heavy reliance on agriculture and a lack of industrialization, which made it vulnerable to economic fluctuations. Additionally, excessive government spending, particularly during the Spanish Civil War and its aftermath, contributed to significant national debt. Economic mismanagement, coupled with the loss of colonies in the late 19th century, diminished Spain's global economic standing and led to periods of bankruptcy. These issues, combined with external pressures such as global economic crises, further exacerbated Spain's financial instability.
FAll
Cause of its comparison to the other economic systems.
Economic Causes of World War OneOne Ecinomical cause of WWI is land, everyone WANTED LAND!
The political instability, economic and social problems, and weakening frontiers cause the decline of the Roman Empire.
economic issues
The Roman Empire One the many theories as to why the Roman Empire fell blames unthoughtful leaders, economic inflation, and invasions by hostile forces. *Geography in this case was the CAUSE of the Roman Empire.
The decline in population was harmful to the Roman Empire because it led to a decrease in available labor, which impacted the agricultural and economic productivity of the empire. The loss of population also weakened the military strength of the empire, making it vulnerable to external threats. Additionally, with fewer people to pay taxes, the empire struggled to fund its administration and defense.
The cause of rise in independent regional powers after the decline of the Mughal Empire was the emergence of Successor States to the Mughals.
Slavery was in the past considered a contributor to the decline of the western part of the Roman Empire because slaves were war captives, and the supply of slaves dwindled with the end of imperial expansion. This was assumed to have affected production. This view has now been challenged. Slave labour was not used everywhere in the Roman Empire, neither the western nor the eastern part. It was a big feature especially in Italy but was not widespread in many places outside Italy. It was virtually absent in Africa and much of the eastern part of the empire. Moreover, even during the heyday of slave labour, there was the use of wage labour for the more seasonal type of agriculture, especially olive and grape picking. In the Later Empire there was the growth of servile peasant labour on the large landed estates in many areas of the empire. Therefore, even in the eras with large use of slave labour, there was this type of labour supply. Archaeological finds challenged he concept of economic decline of the Roman Empire. In the east, in Egypt, Palestine and Syria there was actually economic growth. In the west, Africa was prosperous. In the south of Italy there was economic growth. In Africa and Egypt there seem to have been an increase in the use of wage labour. Southern Gaul did not seem to have been in economic decline. Economic decline seems to have occurred in northern Italy, northern Gaul and Britannia. These regional variations were not linked to the presence or absence of slaves or the extent of slave labour and a proportion of the total labour force.
The invasions by the Germanic peoples precipitated the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire. They eventually took over all of its lands. The eastern part of the Roman Empire was not affected by these invasions and continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years.
barberians
overpopulation
Few economic opportunities and increasing industrialization
State which development if you want an answer.
Famine and disease spread throughout the empire