If a primary consumer was removed from an ecosystem the secondary consumer would more than likely adapt to survive. History has shown us that some species are better than others at adapting and the more versatile a species is, the longer they survive. Now more species than ever are in danger because of their natural habitat being destroyed, but on the positive side there are many more convenience stores open now which will give them a fighting chance.
If something happens and foreign consumers begin to buy more goods and services made in the United States, everything else held constant, what do you predict will happen to aggregate demandIf something happens and foreign consumers begin to buy more goods and services made in the United States, everything else held constant, what do you predict will happen to aggregate demand
During the economic boom, advertisers tried to show a lifestyle that consumers would want to copy.
f66fhThe price of corn would go up
If producers did not exist, consumers would struggle to obtain goods and services necessary for their daily lives. Without producers to create products, there would be a complete lack of supply, leading to scarcity and unmet needs. This would result in consumers facing difficulties in fulfilling even basic requirements, ultimately leading to a breakdown in the economy and society as a whole.
If there were more secondary consumers than primary consumer, then the primary consumers may not be able to find food to survive and become extinct. With too many secondary consumers as a result of no predators of them, then all of the plants may become extinct as well, causing the whole food chain to die out.
Without secondary consumers, primary consumers would likely experience an increase in population, leading to overgrazing or overconsumption of primary producers. This could disrupt the entire food chain and ecosystem balance, ultimately affecting the biodiversity and stability of the ecosystem.
What would happen if grasses and shrubs were removed from an ecosystem? A.the primary consumers would increaseB.the primary consumers would become secondary consumersC.the primary consumers would die out or move elsewhereD.the primary consumers would stay unchanged
The number of primary consumer will increase and it will eat producers which utlimately leads to distruction of all live forms on the earth
the plant will die
If the primary circuit is closed, the current will flow through the primary coil, inducing a magnetic field. This magnetic field will in turn induce a current in the secondary coil, allowing for the transfer of energy from the primary to the secondary circuit.
If the number of turns in the primary is the same as the secondary, this would be an isolation transformer. Primary and secondary voltages should match (minus the inherent transformer losses), as should the current.
the whole food chain would be destroyed
If tertiary consumers were to die out in an ecosystem, there would be a significant disruption in the food web. Their absence would likely lead to an overpopulation of secondary consumers, which could deplete the populations of primary consumers and subsequently affect the primary producers. This imbalance can result in habitat degradation and a decline in biodiversity, as the ecosystem struggles to maintain its equilibrium without the regulatory role that tertiary consumers play. Ultimately, the entire ecosystem's health and stability would be compromised.
if the producers disappeared the other animals such as the primary, secondary,and tertiary consumers and the decomposer would not have anything to eat because the producers would not exist so all the other animals would become extinct.
The loss of tertiary consumers in a food chain would lead to an increase in the population of their prey, the secondary consumers. This would likely result in a decrease in the population of primary consumers as they are consumed at a higher rate. Overall, the ecosystem could become imbalanced as the food chain is disrupted.
If a primary consumer was removed from an ecosystem the secondary consumer would more than likely adapt to survive. History has shown us that some species are better than others at adapting and the more versatile a species is, the longer they survive. Now more species than ever are in danger because of their natural habitat being destroyed, but on the positive side there are many more convenience stores open now which will give them a fighting chance.