regressive tax. (:
The rich generally have more economic and political power than the poor.
they were not rich and they were not poor they were in the middle
Poor.
There was an uneven distribution. The rich were getting richer, while the poor were getting more poor.
From an economic standpoint, between a rich and a poor country, the poor country will converge more rapidly.
Taxes tend to fall more heavily on the rich compared to the poor, as the wealthy are typically in higher tax brackets and have more financial resources subject to taxation. Additionally, economic downturns and fluctuations can impact the wealthy more significantly due to their larger investments and assets.
they were more for the rich but poor did still play with dominos
There are more poor people in China than rich people. There might be as many as 500,000 poor people for every "rich" person. China, with a population of MORE than one billion people {1,000,000,000}, has a very skewed wealth distribution. Most countries have more poor people than rich. The only way rich people are able to become rich is by suppressing the poor.
Both cuz rich steal from the richer and poor steals from the rich..
The rich generally have more economic and political power than the poor.
The poor face a scarcity of resources more often than the rich because they have more limited resources (most importantly, money). But everyone's resources are technically limited. The rich have more money than the poor, but if they spend it all or lose it all, they also face scarcity. If there is a scarcity of a product or a natural resource, it will affect both the rich and the poor, but as prices rise for resources high in demand, the rich will have more access to them, until there is no more for anyone: both rich and poor.
Both poor and rich had the same taxes, and the poor were getting more poor.
in India, corruption is raising day by day........... all rich becomes more rich, n poor become more poor......
Your society might look down on poor vs. rich relationships because it is more difficult to appreciate the poor than it is to appreciate the rich. In most societies, it is believed that rich people tend to be more educated and sometimes "better" than poor people.
Not at all. However, the spread between rich and poor is much more pronounced. In the USA or UK or Canada, there are rich people and poor people but generally the rich are reasonably rich and the poor still usually have a roof over their heads, or, even if homeless, are able not to starve because of a welfare state. However, in India the rich tend to be very very rich, whilst the poor are very very poor - and there are a lot more poor people than in western countries, so, on average, India can be thought of as a poor country although there are many living there who are very rich.
nobody did
K