Want this question answered?
In a command economy, supply and price are regulated by the government instead of market forces. Also, the government is solely responsible for deciding the goods and services to be produced and how they are distributed.
No, the United States does not have a free market economy. Instead we have a mixed economy- government has some control over economic decisions ,but mostly acts as a regulator
becausIn mercantilism, the government decides pricing instead of the consumer.e it is
This disagreement stems from differing views on government intervention in the economy. Policy activism requires that the monetary and fiscal policy be used in such a way as to improve the economy. This type of reasoning dates back to Keynes, who believed that the economy sometimes needs government help to avoid stagnation. Policy rules require instead that the government use such things as a constant-growth-rate policy so as to accommodate economic growth, but not to attempt to stimulate it. In other words, the economy is best left to its own devices, and government intervention causes more problems than it solves.
there was batter system in ancient periodin modern economy there is trade instead of batter system.
This is called a command economy.
The primary characteristic of a command economy is that supply and price are regulated by the government instead of the market. In this way, the government decides which goods are produced and how they should be distributed.
In a command economy, supply and price are regulated by the government instead of market forces. Also, the government is solely responsible for deciding the goods and services to be produced and how they are distributed.
The super powers did not intervene in Rwanda because it has become the custom to have the UN intervene instead. Unfortunately the UN usually sits on its hands and does very little.
No, the United States does not have a free market economy. Instead we have a mixed economy- government has some control over economic decisions ,but mostly acts as a regulator
They would have to deal with the economy instead of the current government.
becausIn mercantilism, the government decides pricing instead of the consumer.e it is
Attack the Philippines instead
Hoover's stance on the economy was based largely on voluntarism. From before his entry to the presidency, he was a proponent of the concept that public-private cooperation was the way to achieve high long-term growth.
That would be an opinion. Jackson believed in a strong central government instead of state's rights and "manifest destiny." These issues shaped his presidency.
This disagreement stems from differing views on government intervention in the economy. Policy activism requires that the monetary and fiscal policy be used in such a way as to improve the economy. This type of reasoning dates back to Keynes, who believed that the economy sometimes needs government help to avoid stagnation. Policy rules require instead that the government use such things as a constant-growth-rate policy so as to accommodate economic growth, but not to attempt to stimulate it. In other words, the economy is best left to its own devices, and government intervention causes more problems than it solves.
The delegates settled on a federal form of government instead of a system in which power was not divided between state and national government because they believed that it provided for a much stronger national government with a chief executive (the president), courts, and taxing powers.