answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why does actual group productivity never equal potential productivity?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Steiner's model of group productivity 1972 reference?

Steiners modelSteiners suggested that a team is more than individual talents coming together. He suggested that group productivity could be measured by the following equation:Actual productivity = potential productivity - losses due to faulty group processes.Steiner's model of group performanceAP = PP - FP—Actual Productivity (AP) is the team performance at a given time during a game or event and refers to the extent of successful interaction.—Potential Productivity (PP) is the maximum capability of the group when cohesiveness appears at its strongest.—Faulty Processes (FP) are the factors which can go wrong in team performance.


What correctly depicts the relationship between group cohesiveness and group productivity?

When a group is too cohesive, productivity can suffer.


Individual productivity is necessary for group productivity true or false?

true


What is theory of group productivity?

The theory of group productivity suggests that the effectiveness and efficiency of a group in achieving goals is influenced by various factors, such as communication, leadership, cohesion, and individual contributions. By understanding how these factors interact and impact group dynamics, organizations can optimize team performance and productivity.


What is the definition of a potential group in politics?

It depends on the size and financial abilities of the group. A well-capitalized group may register as an 'interest group' or 'lobbyist' who actively try to influence American laws and policy, whereas a local group of concerned citizens may only be able to vote a mayor or school board member in or out of office.


Is it true that Individual productivity is more important than group productivity?

HECK YES! lead and they will follow..


Identify the benefits and disadvantages of cohesive groups?

Advantages & Disadvantages of Group Cohesiveness & ProductivitySupervisors form workplace groups as part of departments, such as human resources or marketing, and to complete projects needing the work of more than one employee. Work teams become cohesive as the team members learn about each others' personalities and strengths and weaknesses. Managers and team leaders may take steps to improve group productivity. Productivity measurements for groups include team-building activities and morale boosters.Group Cohesiveness AdvantagesOver time, members of cohesive groups develop shared values and team loyalty. The familiarity of team members creates smoother, more-effective communication. When working toward a common goal, individual team members bring varied skills and points of view to the project. Group members can fill in for each others' lack of knowledge or shortage of skill. Group Cohesiveness DisadvantagesGroup conformity and group-think are two of the potential hazards of high group cohesiveness. Group conformity happens when teams members adopt similar behaviors, usually in an attempt to fit in or to reduce disagreements between group members. This set of behaviors becomes the group norm. Team members conforming to group norms may cause lowered productivity or lack of creativity and innovation. Group-think happens when individual group members lose the ability to think for themselves and rely on the group to make their decisions. Group Productivity AdvantagesProductivity comes from increases in employee production, measured as units per hour. Productivity may also lead to elevated levels of innovation. Efficiency in technology, labor and management lead to higher productivity rates. Group productivity methods deal with labor efficiency and motivating employees to work harder. Managers may attempt to influence the group by creating high-productivity group norms. Group productivity and cohesiveness may be gained by the team sharing success and status. Group Productivity DisadvantagesWhile there is little disadvantage to productivity, failed attempts to increase productivity may have adverse affects. Managers attempting to duplicate the positive affects of success may manufacture success by setting easier group goals. This leads to teams who underproduce while thinking they're overproducing. On the other hand, attempting to raise productivity by setting the bar too high can lower morale when team members fail to reach the goal.


What is the advantage of the group that is not very Cohesive?

When performance norms are low, productivity may be higher then a cohesive group


Who is the leader of little mix?

Little Mix dosen't have an actual 'leader'.


What computer software use a group of productivity packages that work together easily?

Teamviewer


Individual productivity is necessary for group productivity?

Without individual development v cnt expect grp devp.one hs to improive his individual performance for grp devp.


Has the potential to be the largest structure of the group?

hyphae