Governments often allocate more funding to fossil fuels due to established infrastructure, job creation in traditional energy sectors, and the immediate economic benefits that fossil fuel industries provide. Political lobbying by powerful fossil fuel companies can also influence policy decisions, making it easier to secure funding. Additionally, the transition to green energy involves higher upfront costs and technological challenges, which can deter investment in renewable sources despite their long-term benefits.
Fossil fuels are gas, oil, and coal. They run this economy and our problem is that without them our machines wouldn't run, the cars would be dead, and heat/cooling wouldn't exist. Many products contain oil and those couldn't be produced. We are dependent on fossil fuels. The whole problem with this is that we don't have enough and buring them causes green houses gases, so we will need to come up with newer ways to meet our needs.
"Large surplus of waste corn" - Biomass It depends on where the community is situated on our planet. In many places around the equator (and plenty beyond), the energy of the sun is abundant enough to power a society. The initial cost is great, of course, but at least this is a long-term solution instead of burning precious fossil fuels which should be turned into useful plastics instead of CO2 pollution. But that is the problem with all durable solutions to our energy needs. In places where the sun's presence isn't enough to power communities, wind, water and geothermal energy are good alternatives to conventional use of fossil fuels. Burning waste is also an option, but recycling should come first and burning waste isn't really a 'green' solution, as it still produces a lot of pollution and generally still takes fossil fuels to produce the heat necessary to destroy our waste. Advances in technology have and will continue to make ecosystem-friendly and durable solutions to our energy needs more attractive. It will be only a matter of time before oil and other fossil fuels become to scarce or it is financially more attractive to go green. Not relying on short-term solutions and investing in a durable future is good economics.
The oil crisis of the 1970s led to the emergence of the renewable energy industry. As oil prices skyrocketed and concerns about energy security grew, governments and businesses began investing in alternative energy sources such as solar, wind, and biofuels. This shift aimed to reduce dependence on fossil fuels and promote sustainable energy solutions, ultimately paving the way for innovations and advancements in green technology. Additionally, energy efficiency and conservation measures gained traction as a response to the crisis.
A "gray (or grey) economy" or "gray market" is a part of the economy that is not fully accounted for in official accounting or statistics. It is a type of secondary market that was not the original intention of the manufacturer or buyer. It is similar to a "black market," only not illicit.A "green economy" is an economy that takes into account ecological and environmental factors. It attempts to offset the negative effects of human activities, tries to steer away from models based on fossil fuels, and focus on things like renewable energy.
Nuclear energy ! pros- causes almost no green house gasses, & pollution. cons-can cause melt downs.
they produce energy in a more environmentally friendly way then fossil fuels do
Science. Click the little green arrow next to Science, and then go down to Energy, click the little green arrow next to Energy, and you'll get Fossil fuels.
Alternative fuels are often called green energy because they produce fewer greenhouse gas emissions compared to traditional fossil fuels like gasoline or diesel. Utilizing alternative fuels can help reduce air pollution and mitigate climate change, making them more environmentally friendly and sustainable.
Fossil energy and solar energy are not the same. Fossil energy comes from the combustion of fossil fuels like coal, oil, and natural gas, which release greenhouse gases when burned. Solar energy, on the other hand, comes from harnessing sunlight using photovoltaic cells or solar thermal systems. Solar energy is renewable and does not produce greenhouse gas emissions, unlike fossil fuels.
Green energy affects global warming very little. Of course, green energy equipment has a carbon footprint in its manufacture and transport (unless green energy was used for this), but green energy emits no greenhouse gases, unlike non-renewable energy (fossil fuels).
biofuel is green because it does not uses fossil fuels to do things.
well you see that most of the fossil fuels are used so we can use cars and other green house gas stuff so if we loose it we need to find another sores
Any of the renewable energy sources can be used instead of fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas). They have the advantage of being clean, green and non-polluting to the environment, and not contributing to global warming. They are solar, wind, hydro, tidal and wave, and geothermal among others.
Increased use of fossil fuels
it is a green house gas so that is a disadvantage .
Afuel is a material that releases energy when it burns. These fossil fuels---energy-rich substances ormed from the remains of organisms or as you might say; plants and animals.That was just a reminder for you,the real answer is right here:The potential chemical energy in fossil fuels and food was stored by plants that converted the sun's radiant energy into chemical energy. Now that was the real answer, oyur welcome,Tracey Nichole Gordon.
This is an example of sustainable energy practices that aim to reduce reliance on finite resources like fossil fuels in favor of renewable alternatives. By using biofuels, we can help decrease greenhouse gas emissions and combat climate change while promoting a more environmentally friendly energy source.