* Things the Government Should Provide - these are the things without which society itself cannot hold * Defense from incursion from foreign nations * Defense against attacks from nature: hurricanes, floods, wild boars and the flu * Protection of life, liberty and property: criminal court, police, * Dispute resolution: among people, businesses and lower governments - civil court, support of contracts * Facilitate contribution: universally accessible polling places, frequent open meetings for discussion issues, unwavering support of the rights of its citizens to praise, criticize and participate in their government. Note that defense against terrorism doesn't have its own item. I would argue that it falls under "Protection of life, liberty and property" rather than under "Defense from incursion from foreign nations," but the current president seems to think it is more of a war. * Things the Government Might Provide - these are the things we might want to help one another out with, but without which society itself would not crumble to anarchy * Protection from non-transmittable disease: health care program beyond the scope of vaccination and disease control. * Protection from poverty: poverty is notoriously difficult to overcome, and programs such as welfare, Medicaid and low-income housing have tried to break the cycle. Their efficacy is debatable, though their goal decidedly good. * Education (or protection from idiocy): here I will merely comment that paying for education with local property taxes is a bad idea because of the poverty -> poor schools -> poor jobs -> poverty cycle. On the other hand, completely socializing education means people will be paying for schools that they will never use. Education seems to be a semi-public good like many of the others in this category. * Infrastructure: things like roads, airports, internet access, telephone lines, the electromagnetic spectrum could be entirely paid for by the government, entirely paid for by usage fees or by some sort of balance between the two. I am currently leaning towards government footing the bill from the start, but people paying back into the system based on use to support future improvements; regardless, we should have a consistent strategy across media. * Things the Government Should not Provide * Subsidies for items that are not public goods (sugar, oil, diapers, art). A free and open market will determine what is of value to produce and sell. (Note that in re: art, I think it may be important for government to instill an appreciation for art, for it is often said that a society's art is the measure of its worth.)
there were many programmes which was adopted by government for elder peope,women,and poor: 5 year plan. self employement. national assosiation pragrammes. pension for long life.
in the inflation situation government should careful about the expenditure. Government should exercise monetary policy . it will help to implement investment. imran ali, student ,p.u ,bangladesh
Welfare
how dose the government help competitiveness
Laissez-faire thinkers like Adam Smith, Thomas Malthus, and David Ricardo opposed government efforts to help poor workers because they believed that market forces should determine economic outcomes without interference. They argued that such interventions could distort the natural equilibrium of supply and demand, potentially leading to inefficiencies and dependency. Additionally, Malthus posited that population growth would outpace resources, suggesting that any aid might exacerbate poverty in the long run. Overall, they maintained that individual initiative and competition were the best means to improve conditions for the poor.
You should help the poor if you do you will be blessed
Progressives believed that the government should have policies that protected workers. They also thought government should help the poor.
Absolutely, because nobody else will pitch in to help if the government doesn't take the responsibility.
the government
Most progressive agreed that the government should protect workers and help the poor. Progressivism focuses on the use of advancements in social organization and technology to improve quality of life.
Wealthy classes should help the poor because it is the right thing to do. All people should help one another if they have the ability to do so.
democratic
3851-350
Yes
we should the poor by letting the poor have a job,money, and a home
No, they get help from the government or charity groups.
by donating .by building homes