The government shouldn't intervene in resource allocation. The idea that politicians without a profit motive (usually with their own reelection as a motive) could possibly reliably allocate resources more effectively than private entrepreneurs is the height of hubris.
laissez faire
In a free enterprise (market) economy, the expected role of the government is to allow free operation of the market unless market failure occurs at which point it intervenes to prevent welfare losses.
Laissez faire
Economic analysis cannot provide such an answer because it seeks to address positive questions such as "what is."
There are times when the government should let the market work, because fair competition leads to competitiveness and productivity. There are other times when the government should intervene, as in the case of monopolies using unfaircompetition to cheat the rest of society.
Not at all
laissez faire
laissez faire
laissez faire
False.
Coal mining.
Absolutely False.
5 Circumstances under which the government should intervene on theReligious rights of others:-should not affect the faith or beliefs of other human beingsShould not lead the practitioner into degeneration of humanitarianismShould not force others to join their religionShould not be based on radical fanaticismShould not be against the law of nature
The extent to which government should intervene in the lives of their citizens is a complex question with no definitive answer. However, government intervention should aim to protect the rights and well-being of citizens, ensure equal opportunities, and create a just and inclusive society. It should strike a balance between providing necessary public services and preserving individual liberties and privacy. Ultimately, the level of intervention should be guided by the principles of democracy, accountability, and respect for human rights.
Yes, bystanders should intervene. Having someone just standing around will not help the situation.
Cigarette packages should carry a warning of the health issues involved with smoking.
In a free enterprise (market) economy, the expected role of the government is to allow free operation of the market unless market failure occurs at which point it intervenes to prevent welfare losses.