0
In the time period before the US Civil War, the years between 1800 & 1860, as an example, ending slavery all at once would have disrupted the economy of the South.
The slave workers who were not paid, would be freed slave or Southern farmhands who would have had to be paid.
It's clear that such a large disruption would adversely affect a large portion of the large plantations growing cotton and tobacco.
A more logical way would be to as rapidly as possible, create a step by step elimination of slavery based on a system that would do the most good without extending slavery too long in the USA.
Lincoln looked at the method the British used in eliminating slavery in the West Indies. There slave owners were compensated by the government in order to make the transition more feasible.
Based on the $multi million cost of the Civil War on both sides, compensating slave owners would most certainly be less than the cost of the War. This does even speak about the loss of life & limbs that no cost can be attached to.
What else can I help you with?
Why did many Southerners object to ending the slave trade?
They feared that the Southern economy would be ruined if slavery was outlawed.
Why the South's economy depend on slavery?
Being a state that was basically run off agriculture and farming, the south were very dependant on its labour, for if there was no labour there would be no money and if there was no money there was no economy. Slavery played a massive role (well realistically the only role) in the southern economy.
Which groups argued that slavery was necessary for the economy?
Proponents of slavery, particularly in the Southern United States, argued that it was essential for the economy, especially for the cultivation of cash crops like cotton, tobacco, and sugar. Southern plantation owners, along with some politicians and economists, claimed that the agricultural economy relied on enslaved labor for profitability and growth. They believed that the abolition of slavery would lead to economic decline and social instability. Additionally, some Northern industrialists argued that the cotton produced by enslaved labor was crucial for the textile industry, further entrenching the economic rationale for slavery.
Did scalawags argue that slavery was necessary for the economy?
Scalawags, who were Southern whites that supported Reconstruction and the Republican Party after the Civil War, generally did not argue that slavery was necessary for the economy. Instead, they often sought to promote economic development and integration with the Northern states, advocating for policies that would benefit the South's economy in a post-slavery context. Many scalawags were more focused on progressive reforms and rebuilding the South rather than defending the institution of slavery.
Who felt that abolition of slavery would destroy the economy?
The southeners, because they used slaves for their main cash crop.
Why did southern slave owners fear northern attitudes towards slavery?
The loss of slavery would threaten the Southern economy.
Why did many Southerners object to ending the slave trade?
They feared that the Southern economy would be ruined if slavery was outlawed.
Why did the southern slave owners fear the northern attitudes toward slavery?
The loss of slavery would threaten the southern economy
Why would James Henry Hammond say about whether or not slavery should end?
James Henry Hammond was a strong advocate for the continuation of slavery. He believed that slavery was a necessary and beneficial institution for the economy and society of the Southern United States. Hammond argued that slaves were better off under the care of benevolent masters and that ending slavery would lead to chaos and destruction.
Who declared an end to slavery in the rebellious states?
If your referring to the USA, it would be Abraham Lincoln. He wrote the emancipation proclamation ending slavery in the southern states. Hope This Helps
What kind of problems would ending slavery cause before the beginning of civil war?
It would have reduced the Southern workforce and the profitability of the cotton trade.
Why the South's economy depend on slavery?
Being a state that was basically run off agriculture and farming, the south were very dependant on its labour, for if there was no labour there would be no money and if there was no money there was no economy. Slavery played a massive role (well realistically the only role) in the southern economy.
What are the Gradual Abolitionists?
The Gradual Abolitionists were advocates for ending slavery gradually by implementing laws and policies that would gradually phase out the institution of slavery. They believed that a slow and controlled approach to ending slavery would be more practical and less disruptive to the economy and social order. This approach contrasted with the immediate abolitionists who called for the immediate and complete end to slavery.
How did actions of northern states differ from actions of southern states regarding slavery after the American revolution?
The northern states began working to end slavery, but the southern states needed slaves because they thought their economy would suffer without them.
How did The actions of the northern states differ from actions of southern states regarding slavery after the American revolution?
The northern states began working to end slavery, but the southern states needed slaves because they thought their economy would suffer without them.
How did the actions of northern states differ from actions of southern states regarding slavery after the American revolution?
The northern states began working to end slavery, but the southern states needed slaves because they thought their economy would suffer without them.
How did the actions of northern states differ from action of southern states regarding slavery after the American revolution?
The northern states began working to end slavery, but the southern states needed slaves because they thought their economy would suffer without them.
