Yes, royal governors often had to please the people to maintain stability and support for colonial administration. While they were appointed by the crown and held significant power, their effectiveness depended on their ability to balance the interests of the local populace with the directives of the monarchy. Failure to do so could lead to unrest, resistance, or even rebellion, undermining their authority and the crown’s influence in the colony. Thus, maintaining popular support was crucial for their governance.
no
A variety of people did. There were royal governors, elected governors, and various legislative houses in each colony.
They had royal governors and elected assemblies.
The appointment of unpopular or incompetent royal governors to colonies.
Colonial legislatures controlled the income given to royal governors.
Please specify what you mean by royal empire.
Where ever they please.
Who had the final authority over the colonists, royal governors, colonial legislatures, citizens themselves, the English monarch
Yes they did.
Yes they did.
i have one mint condition . is for sale. make me an offer
they elected the governors