Critical thinking isn't so much an influence as it is a necessary prerequisite. If you write without thinking, your work will be random and incoherent; just whatever popped into your head. It won't make sense to anyone, even to you when you read it later.
The only way to write convincingly and with force is to plan out what you will say. Some people plan with an outline, others by writing a rough draft then revising, still others (I envy them) by working things out in their heads, but every good writer thinks carefully about his work.
Critical thinking is a special way of digesting what you read in a complex, insightful way. It teaches you to, among other things, "read between the lines." Thus critical thinking can help you read in a way that gets behind what the author is really trying to say, besides what is obviously happening in the text.
That's a good question, but also incredibly vague. You could either answer it equally vaguely: It will influence all of those things positively, or you could go on for pages. Briefly... hopefully critical thinking is already influencing each of us and the way that we read, write, and process information. As we learn more about critical thinking and become better at critical thinking, perhaps we question things that we hear, or read, or see more. We don't take news articles at face value until we do our own research. We don't accept marketing material and believe it blindly. We don't just repeat things that we've heard without thinking critically and comparing sources.
What you are reading can influence how you should read it by affecting your understanding, interpretation, and emotional response to the text. Factors such as the genre, author's purpose, historical context, and literary devices used can all impact how you approach and engage with the material. It's important to be aware of these influences to read effectively and critically.
the tone
ad “Dead Men's Path” by Chinua Achebe (1930) and respond to the following in 350-400 words. As you read “Dead Men’s Path,” think about how it is an example of the failure to think critically through the nuances of a situation, and ask yourself how (in what specific ways) does Michael Obi fail to think critically—and why? Additionally, how does the story, in terms of its thematic concerns, relate to critical thinking, as you understand the term at this point?
criticize things for the sake of criticizing.
First I must point out that the sentence is very badly structured and phrased, it is not good English. Taking the sentence as is, with commas added it would read like this:- 'Christy is working on becoming an intentional learner, in fact she has successfully learned to engage her learning patterns, think, read and write critically' I would suggest that a better way of saying what I think the sentence is trying to convey would be:- "Christy is aiming to become an intentional learner, she has successfully learned to improve her ability to read and write and think critically."
when you read, you think. if any problem occurs in the book your reading lets say, you would be thinking, how would the character his/her problem. that is one way of thinking when your reading, another way is when your thinking about whats going on in the book. if you don't understand it, the book is not right for you.
No, read is an action that somebody does.
In order to truly read critically, every aspect of what you are reading must be paid attention. The author's own words must be put through a filter which takes into consideration what motives lie behind the words.
when you read, you think. if any problem occurs in the book your reading lets say, you would be thinking, how would the character his/her problem. that is one way of thinking when your reading, another way is when your thinking about whats going on in the book. if you don't understand it, the book is not right for you.
Verifying facts and thinking about the writer's motivations.