Only if it begins a new clause. We say I like everyone, including you. If there is no new clause, there should be no comma. We say This group is including you in its membership.
It depends. Simply put, if:- the "including" modifies the word before it, then "No comma" (E.g., "Books including the new drawings in them... .")- the "including" lists parts/examples of the word before it, then "Yes, add a comma" (E.g., "Books, including booklets, dictionaries, directories, atlases, ... .")
Yes
Yes, you would typically use a semicolon before the word "including" and a comma after it when listing items in a sentence to maintain clarity and proper punctuation. For example: "The ingredients for the cake include flour, sugar, and butter; including vanilla extract for added flavor."
When which is used to introduce a nonrestrictive adjectivial clause it must it must follow a comma. But there are numerous examples where which does not need to follow a comma. Including: Which melon do you want? I can't tell which melon to buy.
last comma before the and is not necessary
Typically, a comma is not needed at the end of a list if it is the last item in the list. However, some style guides, such as APA, recommend using a serial comma (also known as the Oxford comma) that is placed before the conjunction in a list, including the one before the final item, for clarity and consistency.
No, a comma does not go before the word 'in'.
no. if but before is a sentence on its on and after but is a sentence on its own then put a comma before but.
the comma would be before Or In A Sentencee. =]
The comma goes after.
The serial comma is also called the Oxford comma because it is commonly used by writers and editors at Oxford University Press. The use of the serial comma helps clarify lists by separating each item with a comma, including before the conjunction.
Not necessarily. There is no word in English that requires a comma after it or before it.