It depends. Simply put, if:
- the "including" modifies the word before it, then "No comma" (E.g., "Books including the new drawings in them... .")
- the "including" lists parts/examples of the word before it, then "Yes, add a comma" (E.g., "Books, including booklets, dictionaries, directories, atlases, ... .")
When which is used to introduce a nonrestrictive adjectivial clause it must it must follow a comma. But there are numerous examples where which does not need to follow a comma. Including: Which melon do you want? I can't tell which melon to buy.
It could go either ways?
A comma typically goes before "so" when it is used at the beginning of a sentence to indicate a reason or result. However, when "so" is used as a conjunction in the middle of a sentence, it does not usually need a comma before it.
Not necessarily. There is no word in English that requires a comma before or after it.
Yes, you would typically use a semicolon before the word "including" and a comma after it when listing items in a sentence to maintain clarity and proper punctuation. For example: "The ingredients for the cake include flour, sugar, and butter; including vanilla extract for added flavor."
No, a comma does not go before the word 'in'.
When which is used to introduce a nonrestrictive adjectivial clause it must it must follow a comma. But there are numerous examples where which does not need to follow a comma. Including: Which melon do you want? I can't tell which melon to buy.
Yes
Not necessarily. There is no word in English that requires a comma before or after it.
after
No.
no
After
Before
It could go either ways?
A comma typically goes before parentheses if the sentence structure requires it. For example, in the sentence "She decided to go to the park (which was quite crowded), despite the weather," the comma is placed before the parentheses. However, if the parentheses are at the end of a sentence and the sentence does not require a comma, then no comma is needed.
Yes, but a space comes after the comma like this:, inc