0
What else can I help you with?
What does a historian typically do immediately after forming a historical question?
Begin developing a historical argument to answer the historical question
What describes a historical argument?
A historical argument presents a claim based on evidence from historical sources and research. It aims to explain and interpret past events, often analyzing the causes and consequences of historical events or developments. Effective historical arguments are supported by strong evidence and critical analysis.
What is a good argument of Darwin bombing?
There is no argument - it happened.
Is argument good for the friendship?
I believe that argument is good for a good friendship as you can freely say what you feel and there is no restrictions..
Which of The following best describes a historical argument?
A explanation for why a past event happened apex
What student develops a historical argument to support a thesis she uses the following graphic organizer to structure her argument. which answer choice could be the students thesis?
Answer is a
Mental qualities of a good salesman?
A good salesman is the one who can made a rational argument from irrational argument...
What is an historical argument?
A historical argument is a reasoned interpretation or analysis of historical events, typically supported by evidence from primary and secondary sources. It involves constructing a narrative or thesis based on research and critical thinking to explain past events and their significance. Historical arguments can vary in complexity and focus, addressing specific questions or debates within the field of history.
Which term describes a clearly stated argument supporting a particular point of view?
Two arguments about a historical event contradict each other. How should historians determine which argument is superior?
Two arguments about a historical event contradict each other. How should historians determine which argument is superior?
Search for additional evidence to see which argument it supports.
What sources of historical evidence would most help the historian form a historical argument to answer this question?
Primary sources such as written records, letters, official documents, and artifacts from the time period in question would be crucial for a historian to form a strong historical argument. Additionally, archaeological remains, oral histories, and other contemporary accounts would provide valuable evidence to support the argument. Comparing and analyzing different types of evidence can help to create a well-rounded and robust historical interpretation.
What is the difference between a valid or invalid argument?
An invalid argument is when the facts you are using are invalid or your forms of defense are wrong or incorrect, a valid argument is the opposite of an invalid argument. "There is a windmill in my beard. your argument is invalid." (This is a good example of a bad contradiction)
