Yes, a comma should be used after the independent clause when it is followed by a dependent clause. This helps to clarify the relationship between the two clauses and improve the overall readability of the sentence.
A comma
If should be followed by a dependent clause, a comma, an independent clause and then a period.
If the girl likes it, then she should follow her likes, so no, it's not weird!!!!
They should, if they expect to be able to teach the language to students. It doesn't necessarily have to be their native language, but they should be highly proficient in it. It is nearly impossible for one to teach Spanish (or any other language, for that matter) without speaking it, whether it be their native tongue or not. Thus, most (if not all) Spanish teachers speak Spanish.
Yes, the term "Commerce Clause" should be capitalized in a sentence as it refers to a specific clause in the United States Constitution.
A comma before "which" depends on whether it introduces a nonessential clause. If the information following "which" is necessary for the sentence's meaning, no comma is needed. However, if the clause is nonessential, a comma before "which" is appropriate.
Yes, you should use a comma to separate a dependent clause and a verb.
The clause that says that all apples should be mashed before being eaten, on penalty of DEATH
You should look for its condition, its age, what denomination it is, and if it's a US or German coin, whether it has a mint mark letter..
It depends on whether you are referencing me or my. If you are using me as in 'to me', then it should be written 'a mí'. If you intend to use the possessive as in 'my pencil', then it is without an accent, 'mi lápiz'.
A residuary clause in a will specifies how any remaining assets should be distributed after all specific bequests and debts have been settled.