answersLogoWhite

0

It is probable that your evidence is wrong on both counts. Research further and you may find an alternative answer which is probably the right one.

OR

Decide which answer has the most merit by looking at the supporting evidence

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What should you do if you find evidence that supports opposing conclusions based on your research question?

If you find evidence that supports opposing conclusions based on your research question, weigh the evidence for both conclusions and pick the one you think is most convincing.


What should you do if you you find evidence that supports opposing conclusions based on your research question?

If you find evidence that supports opposing conclusions based on your research question, weigh the evidence for both conclusions and pick the one you think is most convincing.


What should you do if in the process of gathering information about a research question you find evidence that supports two opposing conclusions?

Weigh the evidence for both conclusions and decide which has the most merit


Can you subpoena the opposing party for evidence in small claims?

This question is not clear, kindly check it and ask again.


Do you have to get approval of your evidence from opposing lawyer before a trial?

you as a defendant are entitled to all discovery from the prosecutor. If that did not answer your question, please be more clearer on what you need to know.


What is evidence in an experiment?

Evidence in an experiment refers to the data collected and observations made during the course of the investigation. This evidence is used to support or refute the hypothesis being tested and serves as the basis for drawing conclusions. It should be objective, reproducible, and relevant to the research question.


What is sub conclusions?

it is when you ask a question and answer it


When do you draw conclusions?

When you think you have found the answer to your question.


Do conclusions that are not logically supported invalidate the entire study?

Conclusions that are not logically supported do not necessarily invalidate the entire study, but they do call into question the credibility and reliability of the findings. Researchers should ensure that their conclusions are based on sound logical reasoning and evidence to maintain the validity of their study.


You find that there are compelling arguments for opposing arguments in response to your research question what can you do?

Incorporate the opposing arguments into your research to provide a more comprehensive analysis. Address the opposing arguments with counterarguments backed by evidence to strengthen your research. Acknowledge the validity of the opposing arguments while highlighting the strengths of your own research.


What evidence do you need to collect to investigate the question and why?

To investigate a question effectively, you need to collect both qualitative and quantitative evidence relevant to the topic. This may include data from surveys, experiments, or observations, as well as expert opinions and existing literature. Gathering diverse types of evidence allows for a more comprehensive understanding of the issue and helps to identify patterns or correlations. Ultimately, this evidence is crucial for drawing informed conclusions and making sound recommendations.


What are the steps of Analyzes evidence?

Analyzing evidence involves several key steps: first, clearly define the question or hypothesis to focus the analysis. Next, gather relevant data and information, ensuring it is credible and reliable. Then, evaluate the evidence by examining its context, accuracy, and relevance, while considering any biases. Finally, synthesize the findings to draw conclusions and determine how they support or refute the initial question or hypothesis.