Weigh the evidence for both conclusions and decide which has the most merit
When one is contracting, the opposing muscle is relaxing.
friction
Forces acting against each other.
equilibrium
Terminal velocity- When a falling object is no longer accelerating; the force due to gravity is equal to the opposing force of air resistance.
If you find evidence that supports opposing conclusions based on your research question, weigh the evidence for both conclusions and pick the one you think is most convincing.
If you find evidence that supports opposing conclusions based on your research question, weigh the evidence for both conclusions and pick the one you think is most convincing.
It is probable that your evidence is wrong on both counts. Research further and you may find an alternative answer which is probably the right one.ORDecide which answer has the most merit by looking at the supporting evidence
Yes, one can oppose the theory of evolution without opposing the scientific method. The scientific method involves forming hypotheses, conducting experiments, and drawing conclusions based on empirical evidence. If someone believes that the theory of evolution does not have sufficient evidence to support it, they may oppose it while still respecting the scientific method.
He is challenging the "admissability" of the evidence (i.e.- he is saying that it is "nadmissable").
In the adversarial system, two opposing parties present their cases to a neutral judge or jury who decides the outcome. In the inquisitorial system, the judge takes an active role in investigating the case and gathering evidence.
The four components to an argument are the claim (the main point or position), evidence (facts or information that support the claim), reasoning (the logic connecting the evidence to the claim), and counterarguments (opposing viewpoints that are addressed).
If you are rebutting then you are offering opposing evidence or arguments. You may be disproving somebody's assertion, or questioning some piece of evidence.
That is a paper that is filed in a court case that tells the opposing party in the case to release all the information they have. This is so there are no surprises in the court room. It basically tells the defendant what the prosecution or plaintiff is using for evidence.
An opposing claim is a claim against your thesis statement. A counterclaim goes along with an opposing claim that proves or shows evidence as to why your opposing claim is what it is.
This question is not clear, kindly check it and ask again.
In the inquisitorial system, the judge takes an active role in investigating and gathering evidence, while in the adversarial system, the opposing parties present their cases and evidence to the judge or jury. The inquisitorial system is more common in civil law countries, while the adversarial system is used in common law countries like the United States.