answersLogoWhite

0

Weigh the evidence for both conclusions and decide which has the most merit

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What should you do if you find evidence that supports opposing conclusions based on your research question?

If you find evidence that supports opposing conclusions based on your research question, weigh the evidence for both conclusions and pick the one you think is most convincing.


What should you do if you you find evidence that supports opposing conclusions based on your research question?

If you find evidence that supports opposing conclusions based on your research question, weigh the evidence for both conclusions and pick the one you think is most convincing.


What should you do if in the process of researching your question you find evidence that supports opposing conclusions?

It is probable that your evidence is wrong on both counts. Research further and you may find an alternative answer which is probably the right one.ORDecide which answer has the most merit by looking at the supporting evidence


Can one oppose the theory of evolution without opposing the scientific method?

Yes, one can oppose the theory of evolution without opposing the scientific method. The scientific method involves forming hypotheses, conducting experiments, and drawing conclusions based on empirical evidence. If someone believes that the theory of evolution does not have sufficient evidence to support it, they may oppose it while still respecting the scientific method.


When an attorney gives a statement of disapproval about evidence from the opposing side what is that statement called?

He is challenging the "admissability" of the evidence (i.e.- he is saying that it is "nadmissable").


What are the key differences between the adversarial system and the inquisitorial system in legal proceedings?

In the adversarial system, two opposing parties present their cases to a neutral judge or jury who decides the outcome. In the inquisitorial system, the judge takes an active role in investigating the case and gathering evidence.


What are the four components to an argument?

The four components to an argument are the claim (the main point or position), evidence (facts or information that support the claim), reasoning (the logic connecting the evidence to the claim), and counterarguments (opposing viewpoints that are addressed).


If you were rebutting something what would you be doing?

If you are rebutting then you are offering opposing evidence or arguments. You may be disproving somebody's assertion, or questioning some piece of evidence.


What is a document of discovery?

That is a paper that is filed in a court case that tells the opposing party in the case to release all the information they have. This is so there are no surprises in the court room. It basically tells the defendant what the prosecution or plaintiff is using for evidence.


What is the definition of opposing claim?

An opposing claim is a claim against your thesis statement. A counterclaim goes along with an opposing claim that proves or shows evidence as to why your opposing claim is what it is.


Can you subpoena the opposing party for evidence in small claims?

This question is not clear, kindly check it and ask again.


What are the key differences between the inquisitorial system and the adversarial system in the legal process?

In the inquisitorial system, the judge takes an active role in investigating and gathering evidence, while in the adversarial system, the opposing parties present their cases and evidence to the judge or jury. The inquisitorial system is more common in civil law countries, while the adversarial system is used in common law countries like the United States.