The APA AND in-text citations
No, radioactive dating does not produce exact results. No form of radioactive dating produces exact results. But results can be gotten that are surprisingly accurate. As a "for instance" we might look at uranium-lead dating. This dating method can deliver results accurate to a million or two years in a billion years. That's about 0.1 to 0.2 % or so.
Western Blot Test: is a blood test that produces more accurate results than the ELISA test.
You can divide it by the numbers of plants so that it is accurate.
Well, sometimes the answer is specific to the investigation, but you can usually produce a set of better results, by repeating the experiment at least 3 times. If the results are all similar, you can know that they are reliable, but if there is an anomaly, it is most likely, that that set of results are not accurate and you shouldn't use these when you produce your average. (if you decide to have an average. Hope this helps!
Systematic errors produce results that are consistent but not accurate. This means the measurements are close to each other but not necessarily close to the true value. This can lead to misleading conclusions because the error is consistently present in the data.
GIGO stands for "Garbage In, Garbage Out." This concept is important in computing, as it refers to the idea that data that is input into a computer system must be valid and accurate in order to produce accurate results. If bad data is entered, the output will be incorrect. In short, the quality of the output is only as good as the quality of the input. Therefore, it is important to ensure that the data that is being entered into a computer system is valid and accurate in order to produce reliable results.
A lack of accurate results APEX :D
Using electronic data loggers or sensors is likely to produce the most accurate results during an experiment because they can provide precise and real-time measurements without human error or bias. These devices can capture data consistently and in a standardized manner, leading to more reliable results.
It's probably too early, but you could get an accurate result. I'd wait until I was close to starting or after I was late. Then it is more likely to be accurate and it wasn't wasted money on the test.
The answer is Accurate
Biased measurements can be corrected by using an unbiased subject in which results are produced from. That is to say that by using a broader subject matter the results will be less favorable to the required or suggested result and will produce a more accurate result.
Extinction Tied to impact from space