Well, sometimes the answer is specific to the investigation, but you can usually produce a set of better results, by repeating the experiment at least 3 times.
If the results are all similar, you can know that they are reliable, but if there is an anomaly, it is most likely, that that set of results are not accurate and you shouldn't use these when you produce your average. (if you decide to have an average.
Hope this helps!
a valid investigation is an effective investigation i think. The results turn out to be what you had inferred.
Always. Every time. Science is not valid if one can not reproduce the results. QED
Repetition is copying an investigation, while replication of an investigation is the results of an investigation, which is not likely to be accepted unless the investigation is repeated multiple times and the same result is obtained.
they have to make sure that their answers from the similar investigation because it might be wrong
It is important for scientists to communicate to others not only the results of the investigation, but also the methods by which the investigation was done.
suger and salt are different then investigation but you can't improve the investigation because of the dissolving suger at all.
Results get published.
a valid investigation is an effective investigation i think. The results turn out to be what you had inferred.
To improve the results of the investigation, you could consider increasing the sample size to make the findings more representative, ensuring randomization and minimizing bias in data collection, and incorporating control groups for comparison. Additionally, using standardized protocols and validation methods can help ensure the accuracy and reliability of the results.
If you carry out an experiment in science to find out something the investigation report allows you to sum up what is good about the practical experiment and what you want to change and improve in the future. It normally includes a method with equipment list and results tables and graphs to display data.
Always. Every time. Science is not valid if one can not reproduce the results. QED
Repetition is copying an investigation, while replication of an investigation is the results of an investigation, which is not likely to be accepted unless the investigation is repeated multiple times and the same result is obtained.
It is important for people to learn the results of an investigation for transparency, accountability, and to provide closure or justice for those affected by the situation. Understanding the findings can also help prevent similar incidents in the future and improve processes or policies.
reporting the results
How do scientists usually communicate and defend the results of an investigation
Repetition is copying an investigation, while replication of an investigation is the results of an investigation, which is not likely to be accepted unless the investigation is repeated multiple times and the same result is obtained.
they have to make sure that their answers from the similar investigation because it might be wrong