As a parent educator who has had a gifted child in the International Baccalaureate program and as a specialist in gifted education, I find this question to be problematic. For example, if I ask "Which vehicle is best form of transport, a car or a Mazda 626?" you are likely to say "but they are both cars!" You would want to know more detail about the general term "car" which could describe anything from a malfunctioning Model T Ford to the latest model eco-friendly vehicle. You are also likely to want to know what the criteria are for selecting the 'best" car - best in comfort, speed, number of passengers, economy, safest... the list goes on and on. So to answer this question, one has to be able to be able to evaluate and compare the SPECIFIC gifted program against the International Baccalaureate. One also needs indepth details about the International Baccalaureate Program, and make sure that one is comparing "apples with apples" and not apples and Pears. Most importantly, one must look at the learning needs of the gifted student. Gifted how? In what areas? Which strengths are going to be enhanced in this programme? How appropriate is the programme for the short, medium and long term learning goals of this student? The International Baccalaureate is most definitely a programme to stretch our most highly gifted students, whilst still being an achievable goal for motivated, hard-working average and above average students. However, it may not be the right for allgifted. The term "a gifted program" is far too vague, as I have stated. Some gifted programs are poorly conceived and delivered, and inadequately assessed. Their content is not defensible nor necessarily adequate to meet the needs of the students within the program. Some are excellent, matching the type of criteria that a high quality educational program shoudl meet. So - all in all - not a good question. But I do endorse the International Baccalaureate as a program totally suited to challenging and stimulating most (but not necessarily all) gifted students.
As a parent educator who has had a gifted child in the International Baccalaureate program and as a specialist in gifted education, I find this question to be problematic. For example, if I ask "Which vehicle is best form of transport, a car or a Mazda 626?" you are likely to say "but they are both cars!" You would want to know more detail about the general term "car" which could describe anything from a malfunctioning Model T Ford to the latest model eco-friendly vehicle. You are also likely to want to know what the criteria are for selecting the 'best" car - best in comfort, speed, number of passengers, economy, safest... the list goes on and on. So to answer this question, one has to be able to be able to evaluate and compare the SPECIFIC gifted program against the International Baccalaureate. One also needs indepth details about the International Baccalaureate Program, and make sure that one is comparing "apples with apples" and not apples and Pears. Most importantly, one must look at the learning needs of the gifted student. Gifted how? In what areas? Which strengths are going to be enhanced in this programme? How appropriate is the programme for the short, medium and long term learning goals of this student? The International Baccalaureate is most definitely a programme to stretch our most highly gifted students, whilst still being an achievable goal for motivated, hard-working average and above average students. However, it may not be the right for allgifted. The term "a gifted program" is far too vague, as I have stated. Some gifted programs are poorly conceived and delivered, and inadequately assessed. Their content is not defensible nor necessarily adequate to meet the needs of the students within the program. Some are excellent, matching the type of criteria that a high quality educational program shoudl meet. So - all in all - not a good question. But I do endorse the International Baccalaureate as a program totally suited to challenging and stimulating most (but not necessarily all) gifted students.
The gifted program is what I am in. It lets children who have a different way of thinking have no limit and to think free. The gifted program also has advantages, in my gifted program we take Latin.
University of Connecticut is by far the top program in GT.
I believe that answer is NO. I have 2 daughters in the same grade...same mother and father, same household, etc. One is in the Gifted and Talented Program, and one is not. The one who is in the program is in no way smarter, better educated, more focused, more goal oriented, etc. than the one who is not in the program. If anything, it's the other way around. It depends on the quality of the gifted program and the individual temperament of the student. The education system does not challenge average students enough, and has continually failed gifted students as well. There aren't enough norms to develop gifted education standards, but this doesn't excuse the problems for students within 2 standard deviations of the mean.
Rebecca Levenspiel has written: 'Starting a program for gifted students' -- subject(s): Gifted children, Education, Case studies
Journal for the Education of the Gifted was created in 1978.
Private companies like Nagc and Sesp offer fantastic gifted education programs in Chicago. The prices for these education programs are very reasonable. They allow students from every country and nationality to participate.
The Gifted Program was created on 2005-09-06.
The GATE Program is a program that means you are always finished before anyone in school and this means that you will have lots of projects and it means Gifted and talented education. I am in it. Have a good day. Hope this helps.
It is capitalized at the beginning of the sentence or when it forms part of the proper noun Examples: My son tried the gifted program of their school. My son is a member of the Gifted Program Society.
Margie Kitano has written: 'Gifted education' -- subject(s): Education, Gifted children
Virgil S. Ward has written: 'Differential education for the gifted' -- subject(s): Education, Gifted children 'Differential Education for the Gifted (Perspective Through a Retrospective, Vol 2)'