Collis P. Huntington was a powerful man in his time. However, as we all know powerful men are not always good. Which leads us to why do we consider these great, powerful men to be robber barons? Collis P. Huntington was a power hungry fellow. He became involved with Thomas Scott in wanting to control all the lines in California, not just to the Arizona border. While trying to accomplish this he was involved in a hard-fought contest to influence Congress over rights of way. He was reported to be spending $200,000 to $500,000 each session to influence members of Congress. Huntington ended up winning the contest by getting an order from the federal government in 1877 that allowed the Southern Pacific (the railroad company) to build across Arizona and New Mexico. Huntington acted as the railroads lobbyist. He successfully blocked efforts to secure aid for potential competitors in Washington. In 1885 a feud between Collis Huntington and Leland Stanford. Huntington waited five years for revenge and got it by taking Stanford's job as president of the Southern Pacific. These are just a few of many reasons that Collis P. Huntington was a Robber Baron, but they successfully get the point across.
J. D. Rockefeller was considered both a robber baron and a captain of industry.
Yes he was an robber baron
Robber Baron Music was created in 2006.
Vanderbilt was not considered a captain of industry. Instead, he was considered a robber baron.
He was a robber baron. He worked for the railroads in California. (A robber baron was a business leader who became wealthy through dishonest methods.)
John D. Rockefeller can be considered a robber baron, due to his exessive wealth gained from his company, Standard Oil. However, he is also considered a philantropist because of all the money he donated.
The Robber Baron - 1910 was released on: USA: 11 March 1910
yes.
Rowland Hussey Macy was not considered a robber baron. He was the founder of the department store chain Macy's, known for its innovative business practices and retail strategies. While he was a successful businessman who amassed wealth, he did not engage in the monopolistic and exploitative practices often associated with robber barons of the late 19th century.
Cornelius Vanderbilt was not considered a captain of industry as he was more of a entrepreneur. He wasconsidered a robber baron.
he invetned the steel industury -- Actually he was the "main guy" in the oil industry. Carnegie was steel. I would say he is a Robber Baron because he started a monopoly and basically told other oil companies that they would either have to sign a trust (which basically allows him to take over their business and give a small dividend to the trustee) or he would run them out of business. --
yes