Simón Bolívar is often viewed as a success for his role in leading several South American countries to independence from Spanish rule, earning him the title "El Libertador." His vision for a united Latin America, however, faced significant challenges and ultimately fell short, leading to political fragmentation in the region. While his military and political achievements are celebrated, the instability that followed his efforts complicates the narrative of his legacy. Thus, opinions on his success or failure can vary depending on the aspects of his life and impact that one emphasizes.
No chance
Success for Spain: Columbus' voyage opened up the "New World" to European exploitation, which would generate untold wealth for Spain.
I would not say that diversity is necessary for organizational success, but I would say, the education, training and understanding of diversity in organizations where it does exist is critical to its success.
Because everyone desires success and hates failure. Everything we do we hunt for a good result. We usually treat kind to a success just like we are generous and sweet to a child. But to failure, we are so mean and don't want to face it just like we are careless to an orphan
History does not report them as failure. In fact, historians cite the success of their trip.
am
Yes! I would say so:D
成功 しました(せいこう) I just rechecked my Japanese and I only told you how you would say success.
For example you can say: They attributed their failure to lack of preparation
It depends on who is answering the question. If you ask his political opponents (Republicans), they would say yes. But if you ask his political supporters (Democrats), they would say no. As for the independent observers, they would probably say he has done some important things but has not delivered on some of his campaign promises. But only partisans would call any president a failure.
I would say: Time reliability Add forecasting crisis
The German word for success is Erfolg.