Pink, Gloria Estefan, Crystal Bernard and Russell Peters.
If it's proportionate to the number of people in society who still support it, probably about half of celebrities do and half don't.
Though the only "celebrity" I've ever heard speak out against it is Marilu Henner, to be honest.
To be honest, most celebrities DON'T disclose where they stand on the issue, wherever they stand, because there are idiots out there who will boycott someone simply because they disagree with them.
It takes just a small amount of time for you to kill a child during corporal punishment. Why because when angry at a child your anger follows to the amount of force you put into your swing of the arm onto their body. You may not realize it until after you have seen the scares left from it, but by then its to late and you could get charged for child abuse and murder.
Corporal punishment is a form of discipline that involves physically inflicting pain or discomfort on a person as a form of punishment. This can include hitting, spanking, or any other physical act intended to cause pain. It is often used as a disciplinary measure, especially in some educational or domestic settings, but its effectiveness and ethical implications are widely debated.
It is not normal now, as it was banned in 1987 for state schools and 1999 for private schools. Going back in history though, it was very normal. From medieval to Victorian times it was an everyday occurrance in most schools.
Yes, technically schools can, as can be found in the case of Jessica Serafin of San Antonio Texas in 2004 who later took her case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court that ultimately refused to hear the case. Lower courts however sided with the schools-- their basic reasoning being that any student at any age who matriculates into primary or secondary schools are subject to that schools discipline policies and are not considered full adults until they graduate. Common sense would tell you though that young ADULTS (any high school age student) need mature mentoring and serious preparation for the work world they are about to find themselves in.
They should not be verbally abused , but the teacher has a right to call somebody out for inappropiate behavior and specify the infraction. Any further dressing down should be done privately , by the teacher and another staff member. Physical punishment in Public or Private school is never appropiate,
In South Carolina, excessive corporal punishment is generally defined as physical discipline that is disproportionate, unreasonable, or harmful to a child's physical or emotional well-being. The law allows for reasonable corporal punishment, but actions that result in injury, bruising, or lasting emotional distress can be considered excessive. Additionally, any form of punishment that involves objects or excessive force may also fall under the definition of excessive corporal punishment. Ultimately, the determination of what constitutes excessive punishment can often depend on the context and severity of the discipline applied.
In a way, you could ask 'Why is/was any form of punishment used?' Corporal punishment had obvious effect on the wrongdoer, and probably made the punish-er feel good. It also could leave a mark on the receiver, to remind them to never to do that again!
It takes just a small amount of time for you to kill a child during corporal punishment. Why because when angry at a child your anger follows to the amount of force you put into your swing of the arm onto their body. You may not realize it until after you have seen the scares left from it, but by then its to late and you could get charged for child abuse and murder.
Corporal punishment should be banned for the following reasons: 1. It has no place in the education of children. The research shows that children who are beaten and abused are more likely to be prone to depression, low self-esteem and suicide. The simple fact that corporal punishment as a disciplinary measure is not part of any education curriculum indicates that educators at every level know that corporal punishment has no place in the classroom. Discipline can and should be taught be example. 2. It perpetuates the cycle of abuse. The reason why is that they feel it causes irreparable emotional damage to young people, which shows adverse effects on their future life and their own role as a parent/guardian.
No, for most children emphasize on corporal punishment would cause neurotic intraversion and fear of speaking up their opinions or to demand any right for him/herself. In other words, it creates (generally) a very serious case of low self-esteem.
Not only did it "used to be", it still is. The constitution does not contain any specific prohibitions against corporal punishment for children.
josh hutcherson is a scout
Corporal punishment is a form of discipline that involves physically inflicting pain or discomfort on a person as a form of punishment. This can include hitting, spanking, or any other physical act intended to cause pain. It is often used as a disciplinary measure, especially in some educational or domestic settings, but its effectiveness and ethical implications are widely debated.
There is no information about the particular discipline methods Jon Gosselin uses with his children. It is unlikely that he uses any form of corporal punishment (including spanking)
The same reason you'd support a certain team in football, basketball, or any other sports...... they choose to.
It is not normal now, as it was banned in 1987 for state schools and 1999 for private schools. Going back in history though, it was very normal. From medieval to Victorian times it was an everyday occurrance in most schools.
A parent has the right to discipline their child, which includes corporal punishment (spanking/hitting). A child, however, is legally protected from cruel and unusual punishment from the parent. Generally speaking, if the parent is leaving a serious bruise, the child is being subjected to excessive punishment that constitutes "child abuse". Any further specification is a personal opinion.