there is no possible way
unless, you stick a fork in your arm and sing im a little tea pot or post man pat.
The assessment is said to be valid when it accurately measures what it is intended to measure. If an assessment allows one to draw meaningful and appropriate inferences from the results, it demonstrates validity in its use.
An argument should present a clear point of view or claim supported by evidence and reasoning. It should anticipate and respond to counterarguments, showing why the claim is valid and persuasive. Ultimately, the goal is to convince the audience of the validity of the argument.
You evaluate the data you have then explain what it means. "evaluate" - to examine, appraise, judge carefully, fix the worth of something. "explain" - to make something or the meaning of something clear to somebody else.
Things clever eg: wisedom, literature - greek , latin , extended subjects
Theories are judged by their ability to explain a phenomenon, make accurate predictions, and be supported by empirical evidence. They should also be internally consistent and able to withstand scrutiny and testing.
an*
observations can be more valid because when you observe things you are kind of making small facts about it and facts are valid unlike opinions which is giving something you think is valid from your point of view but you are not sure for a fact that its real so to make that short opinions are saying what you believe.
A reliable investigation will allow you to make conclusions that are supported by the data you have collected,and that reflect the findings of other scientists.
One possible benefit would be that, maybe, they could share their knowledge. Maybe it could also be to make the investigation more reliable?
It's as valid as our contributors make it.
CSI had a special investigation to do.
Anybody who gives you an answer to this question is conning you. Scientific investigation has never produced any reliable evidence that human relationships show any consistent association with astrological phenomena.
Some definitely will, and the rest won't. Scientific investigation has never produced any reliable evidence that human relationships show any consistent association with astrological phenomena.
Logically
Distinguishing between valid and faulty generalizations helps ensure that conclusions drawn from specific instances are accurate and reliable. Valid generalizations are based on sound reasoning and evidence, while faulty ones can lead to misinformation and unfair judgments. By being able to identify the difference, we can make better decisions and avoid stereotyping or making misleading assumptions.
I'll take over the investigation from here, Sherlock.
To make sure your results are Valid/reliable. You should always repeat your experiments and if using times or amounts and in the future going to make a graph its best to do the experiment 3 times and calculate the average on place the average result on to your graph.