fokin idiots u mental thats not answer
A test may be reliable but not valid. A test may not be valid but not reliable. For example, if I use a yard stick that is mislabeled to measure the distance from tee to hole in golf on different length holes, the results will be neither reliable nor valid. If you use the same stick to measure football fields that are the same length the result will reliable (repeatable, consistent) but not valid (wrong numbers of yards). There is no test that is unreliable (repeatable, consistent) and valid (measures what we are looking for).
Reliable indicates that each time the experiment is conducted, the same results are obtained (accuracy). Valid indicates the experiment (or test) has controlled variables and used an appropriate method/model.
A bathroom scale that consistently shows your weight as 10 pounds less than your actual weight, but always produces the same result when you step on it multiple times, can be considered reliable (consistent) but not valid (accurate).
The Nelson Critical Thinking Test has been widely used in educational and research settings to assess critical thinking skills. It has shown good reliability in measuring an individual's ability to think critically, but like any test, its reliability can be influenced by various factors such as test administration and scoring procedures. Overall, the Nelson Critical Thinking Test is considered to be a reliable tool for assessing critical thinking skills.
Tickle IQ test is not considered a reliable measure of intelligence by psychologists and professionals in the field. Online IQ tests, in general, are often seen as not accurate or in-depth enough to provide a true reflection of someone's intelligence due to the limited nature of the questions and scoring methods used. It is recommended to consult with a qualified psychologist for a more accurate assessment of IQ.
In my view reliable test is always valid.
You can tell that a test is reliable when many can take it and it holds up. A reliable test can't be biased, and it must measure what it says it's going to measure. A reliable test stands up when compared to other tests.
you have to do a fair test to know that your answers are reliable.
A test may be reliable but not valid. A test may not be valid but not reliable. For example, if I use a yard stick that is mislabeled to measure the distance from tee to hole in golf on different length holes, the results will be neither reliable nor valid. If you use the same stick to measure football fields that are the same length the result will reliable (repeatable, consistent) but not valid (wrong numbers of yards). There is no test that is unreliable (repeatable, consistent) and valid (measures what we are looking for).
A reliable test is one that has the same results over time. This means you can trust the test and its outcome.
Reliable indicates that each time the experiment is conducted, the same results are obtained (accuracy). Valid indicates the experiment (or test) has controlled variables and used an appropriate method/model.
The Charter Speed Test is considered fairly reliable at accurately measuring one's broadband speed. Some users do report inaccuracies though and it is not considered as reliable as 'speedtest'.
Mineralogists often use the physical properties of minerals to identify them. The most reliable test in order to identify a mineral is the test for hardness.
A test may be reliable yet not valid, The results can end up being reliable, in other words certain to have yielded properly based on input. But the results may not be trustworthy.
The most reliable working memory online test for assessing cognitive function is the Cambridge Brain Sciences test.
The most accurate and reliable caffeine test kit available on the market is the High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) test kit.
the test scored appear to be reliable