0
That children are sent to school to learn not to teach so the student in this case were in the wrong by trying to teach others something by wearing armbands
What else can I help you with?
What is an argument that is supported by research and strong evidence is called?
An argument that is supported by research and strong evidence is typically referred to as a well-founded argument. This type of argument relies on credible sources, data, and logical reasoning to bolster its claims and conclusions.
In writing What should an argument do?
An argument should present a clear point of view or claim supported by evidence and reasoning. It should anticipate and respond to counterarguments, showing why the claim is valid and persuasive. Ultimately, the goal is to convince the audience of the validity of the argument.
How is an explanation differ from an argument?
An explanation seeks to clarify or describe a concept or situation, providing information for understanding. In contrast, an argument presents a viewpoint supported by evidence or reasoning, aiming to persuade or convince the audience of a particular claim or position.
Can the rhetorical strategy undermine the credibility of an argument if it is overused?
Yes, if a rhetorical strategy is overused, it can undermine the credibility of an argument by making it seem like the speaker or writer is relying too heavily on persuasion techniques rather than strong evidence or sound reasoning. Overusing rhetorical devices may come across as manipulative or insincere, causing the audience to doubt the authenticity and trustworthiness of the argument.
When you provide elaboration by making a statement and supporting it with multiple facts statistics and personal experience you are?
defining the problem
Read this excerpt from the dissent on Tinker v. Des Moines: The original idea of schools, which I do not believe is yet abandoned as worthless or out of date... What is the reasoning in this argument?
The argument is that children go to school to learn not to teach their elders , where teachers can be included. Public schools are subsidised with taxes. Bearing this in mind, we may say that taxpayers send their children to school for them to learn not to teach. This was what the taxpayers did when they themselves were students . Therefore, taxpayers send their children to school on the premise that, at their age, they needed to learn, not teach is the reasoning of the argument.
How is inductive reasoning different from deductive reasoning?
Inductive reasoning varies from deductive reasoning as follows: 1) inductive reasoning is a reason supporting an argument and 2) deductive reasoning is an argument against an argument.
What is a fallacious argument?
An argument that sometimes fools human reasoning, but is not logically valid.
What if an argument does not commit a fallacy?
If an argument does not commit a fallacy, it means that the reasoning provided supports the conclusion without any logical errors. This indicates that the argument is valid and that the premises lead to a justifiable conclusion. It also suggests that the argument is logically sound and can be considered a strong or persuasive piece of reasoning.
An argument uses unsound reasoning?
fallacious
What is a part of an argument that is flawed and makes the argument invalid an error in reasoning.?
A common error in reasoning that can make an argument invalid is known as a logical fallacy. These are flaws in the logical structure of an argument that can mislead or deceive the audience. Examples of logical fallacies include ad hominem attacks, appeal to authority, and circular reasoning.
How does his personal experience support his reason?
His personal experience supports his reason by providing real-life examples or insights that add credibility and relevance to his argument. It can help to illustrate key points, make the argument more relatable to the audience, and enhance the overall persuasive impact of his reasoning.
What is line of reasoning?
A line of reasoning refers to the structured thought process used to support a conclusion or argument. It involves presenting evidence, logical connections, and reasoning to guide the audience from premises to a conclusion. A clear line of reasoning enhances the persuasiveness and clarity of an argument, helping to establish its validity and soundness. Effective reasoning often anticipates counterarguments and addresses them to strengthen the overall argument.
What is the part of an argument that is flawed and makes the argument invalid an error in reasoning?
That would be a moot point
Is a part of an argument that is flawed and makes the argument invalid an error in reasoning?
Yes, a flawed part of an argument constitutes an error in reasoning which can render the overall argument invalid or weak. Common errors in reasoning include logical fallacies, false premises, inconsistencies, and incorrect assumptions. Identifying and addressing these errors is crucial for building sound and persuasive arguments.
What does it mean to dispute a argument on the basis of the reasoning?
Disputing an argument on the basis of reasoning means criticizing or challenging the logic and rationale behind the argument rather than attacking the person making the argument. It involves examining the premises and conclusions to determine if they are logically sound and valid.
How many conclusions can an argument have?
An argument can have one or multiple conclusions, depending on the complexity of the reasoning and the evidence presented.
