50 Hz has an edge over 60 Hz as it will have less skin effect and therefore line resistance will be less. Therefore, voltage drop as well as unwanted loss of energy in the line will be less. That means dip in supply voltage at user end will be less and efficiency will be more.
Answer
The difference in 'AC resistance' due to the effect of skin effect between 50/60 Hz is insignificant, just as the increase in inductive reactance, or the decrease in capacitive reactance is insignificant.
The answer to your question is that the two frequencies simply resulted from the independent development of electricity distribution networks in different parts of the world, and there is no inherent advantage of one frequency of the other.
<<>>
Transformers for 60 Hz are smaller than for 50 Hz, assuming a given power rating. That is because the iron magnetic core can be reduced in size by 20% for 60 Hz, for the same peak magnetic flux density.
The reactance of capacitors and inductors is significantly higher at 400 Hz than it is at 60 Hz. As a result, power supplies can be built with smaller components, saving space and weight in this (often) aviation application.
CommentWhile inductive reactance is certainly much higher at 400 Hz, compared to 60 Hz, capacitive reactance will be much lower(capacitive reactance is inversely-proportional to frequency).
60hz frequency is being used in us
There's no problem except that the transformer will be more massive than necessary. It will work at the same voltage and current, but there is less iron loss, so the voltage rating can be increased by a maximum of 15-20% and the current rating can be increased by 15-20% also. But if this is in an aircraft or other safety-critical application, do not overrate the transformer.
To covert a high frequency to a low one, we use flip-flops.
A motor-generator or a solid state power converter can do this.Motor-generators are an old electromechanical technology. In this case you would use a 240V 50Hz synchronous motor and a 110V 60Hz generator with their shafts connected so the motor turns the generator.Solid state power converters use a high power rectifier to convert the input AC to DC, a precisely tuned oscillator to set the output frequency, and a high power class AB push-pull amplifier powered by the high voltage DC and driven by the oscillator to generate the output voltage.
One could but there would be additional losses. Older frequency changers use a synchronous motor to turn a synchronous generator with a different number of poles to change frequency. I have seen these used in woodworking. An example is to use a two pole motor to turn a four pole generator to generate power at twice the line frequency. A More modern solution would be to use semiconductors which would also allow the output frequency to be varied.
Yes, using a 220v-60hz microwave in Australia is fine. The voltage of alternating current supplied to homes in Australia is 220v. The frequency of the voltage is 50hz.
60hz frequency is being used in us
You should use a grouped frequency when you have a wide range of scores.
it doesnt have to be kept constant but is convenient little synchronous motors in clocks transformer core materials depend on frequency airplanes use 400hz for less iron and weight in transformers higher frequencies conductors are hollow and silver plated or clad easier to synchronize generators if they are at the same frequency
It should work with no problems, since the frequency does not affect the work or the iron heater.
Instead of fading it, go get it redone.
Yes, as long as the voltage is the same it will not cause any issues. The frequency, or Hertz, is only a problem for large electric motors and clocks.
The U.S. 60 Hz bulb should be useable in the United Kingdom. Even though the U.K. uses 50 Hz bulbs, this small difference in frequency should not matter.
In the USA, and countries influenced by the USA, AC mains power is generated at 60Hz. In Europe and the UK, and countries influence by them, it is generated at 50Hz. This low frequency, was the easiest to generate with machinery at the time the national grid was developed. It made sense to round the frequency to 60Hz as this could then be used for time keeping easily, there being 60 seconds to a minute and 60 minutes to the hour. The European adoption of 50Hz, probably stems from the development of the metric system. 50 being easily divided into 100 without a fraction.
There's no problem except that the transformer will be more massive than necessary. It will work at the same voltage and current, but there is less iron loss, so the voltage rating can be increased by a maximum of 15-20% and the current rating can be increased by 15-20% also. But if this is in an aircraft or other safety-critical application, do not overrate the transformer.
That depends on the information available. You can try to measure the frequency, with specialized equipment. Or, you might measure the wavelength and the speed instead, and use the basic relationship for waves (speed = wavelength x frequency).
Your stereo system has an internal transformer in the power supply that is designed to operate at a given frequency. If it is designed to operate at the load your stereo system will use at 50 Hz, then yes. Otherwise this transformer will overheat when connected at the wrong frequency, and will burn out. You might be lucky and the power supply may be labelled to operate at 50 or 60Hz; if not, I recommend contacting the manufacturer. A voltage transformer will convert 50Hz 220 to 50Hz 110. To change frequency, you need special equipment.