By a lot, it would over populate all the animals that the gray wolf eats.
By: Shamar Shqair
because a food source can become extinct and if the other organisms only food source becomes extinct the species would starve and become extinct and other species will become extinct as well.
The extinction of one species can disrupt an ecosystem by affecting its food web and interactions among species. This can lead to population imbalances, reduced biodiversity, and potentially cascading effects on other species that relied on the extinct species for food or other resources. Without the extinct species playing its role in the ecosystem, the balance and functioning of the ecosystem can be negatively impacted.
If all individuals in a species were to die, the species would become extinct and no longer exist. This would have ecological consequences, potentially disrupting food chains and ecosystems that relied on the species for various functions. It could also impact other species that interacted with or depended on the extinct species in some way.
If an animal becomes extinct, there will be no more of that species left like the Dodo. No more are left as they are extinct.
It would be an extinct species of cats, while other breeds thrive?
The prey species of the river dolphin, such as fish and shrimps, would suddenly boom and dominate the ecosystem as there would be no predator keeping their populations in check. Whatever those prey species feed on would suddenly decrease as there would be more organisms feeding of it. When one species becomes extinct, it can cause other species to also become extinct. However hopefully the ecosystem returns to an equilibrium eventually. Hope this helps!
The extinction of a species would mean the death of a species. Every species has its own niche (or role) in its ecosystem. For example:Carnivores --eat--> Herbivores --eat--> Plants --get nutrition from--> Decomposers --eat dead things. It's an (albeit very small and simple) circle of life.Now if the herbivores were to go extinct, so would the carnivores. If the carnivores were extinct, then the herbivores would eat all the plants until the plants were extinct, and then the herbivores would die of starvation. There's a balance to things that would be crumbled and ultimately, the ecosystem would be very negatively affected if not destroyed.In addition, through studying other species, science can extend its knowledge. Some species have natural adaptations to problems that plague us humans. If science can figure out how those species deal with the problem, that solution could be modified to fit humans, too. If that species goes extinct, that possibility is lost.
When a species dies out completely, it becomes extinct.
This frequently happens. Loss of habitat leads to loss of food sources and shelter. Often, when new non-native species are introduced, it is usually the introduced species that thrives and the native species that becomes extinct. Ultimately, what happens is that yet another species gets marked down as extinct, but nothing is done to address the problem. .. On the other hand, would a species "get marked down" if no observation of it is made? would another species benefit from the extintion? would a species that benefits from the the more plentiful food source consider it "a problem"? would another species suffer a change of diet? is there a species that relied on the feces of the extinct species, or the breath of the species, or some intestinal function, or needed the food source to be kept in check that the extinct species was competing for? would another species be able to use the winning species as a food source, or symbiont, or ...
True
Affect? Affect? Not affect- disaster!
The Saber toothed tiger, which is extinct, is certainly related.