Advantages and disadvantages of procedural oriented language?

Answer 1

1) In Procedural language the programmers concentration is on problem and its solution so we need another approach where the developpers study the entire system and developped.

---- 2) after writing the programmers 10,000 to 1,00,000 lines of code in proce language they are loosing their control on the code.they cant identify the errors easily. latter if any modifications are there in the code it is difficult to modify.

---- 3) proce lang will not reflect the human beings life.but, o.o.prog'ing lang's reflects the human beings life.like inheritance,encapsulation,objects.......etc

By , James

Answer 2

Procedural programming is when an application executes a series of procedures.

In procedural programming, the user is unable to choose what the program does next. In OOP (Object oriented), the user can click on any button they want, but in procedural, it just executed the pre-set procedures, then ends.

Answer 3

The biggest disadvantage is to limit the program flow in 1-dimensional (or linear way). Most of software developers would have been brain-washed to think this way. When dealing with 2 dimensional subjects such as concurrency, multiple threads, synchronization, etc., the topics become E.T. subjects!

Others bad reputations of procedural styles may include:

• spaghetti codes
• patches over patches
• duplicate codes
• everything is global

Note that the above are NOT the characteristics of procedural style. Procedural style programming will have those symptoms easier than other styles such as Functional or Object-Oriented.

In contrast, a well-written procedural code should be very powerful, straight-forwarded, and easy to understand and maintain. It is very difficult to find one

Answer 4

Storage and Access of code is essential to creating a powerful software program.

Code Storage + Code Access = Code Re-Usability.
When a procedural language is deployed to create a big system the storage and reusablilty of code becomes impossible to manage. Procedural Orientated languages are often very good when small tasks need to be completed but when major tasks need to be fulfilled procedural programming becomes to disorganized and confusing.

Answer 5

There is no problem with the procedure oriented programming paradigm. Without it, we wouldn't have any object oriented programming (OOP) languages. Note that the object oriented programming paradigm derives from and extends the procedural programming paradigm; it does not replace it. By the same token, the procedural programming paradigm derives from and extends the structured programming paradigm. As such, all OOP programming languages are both procedural and structured languages. To suggest there is a problem with the procedural programming paradigm is to suggest there is an inherent problem with the object oriented programming paradigm.

The problems we might encounter with a programming language have nothing to do with the paradigms the language implements. To use an analogy, we wouldn't use a hammer to cut a wooden panel in half, but that doesn't mean there is a problem with the hammer; we're simply using the wrong tool for the job at hand. Similarly with programming languages. We choose the paradigms that best serve our needs.

Answer 6

quick and direct to write without the burden of object orient ones.

Answer 7

its faster and oop and i dont know

Answer 8

huda