0
What else can I help you with?
What is difference between linked list and singly linked list?
Answersingly linked list has the node inserted only at one end. and the pointer corresponds to the next pointer.but in a doubly linked list, the node pointer points to the both previous and the next node.singly linked list has two nodesdoubly linked list has three nodesA doubly linked list makes sense when you need to traverse the list in both directions. You aren't able to do that with a singly linked list.
What operation is supported in constant time by the doubly linked list but not by the singly linked list?
examples:- delete this node (identified by a pointer)- insert a new node before this node- replace this node with another node
What is the advantage of doubly linked list over Doubly linked list?
A doubly linked list can be traversed in both directions (forward and backward). A singly linked list can only be traversed in one direction. A node on a doubly linked list may be deleted with little trouble, since we have pointers to the previous and next nodes. A node on a singly linked list cannot be removed unless we have the pointer to its predecessor. On the flip side however, a doubly linked list needs more operations while inserting or deleting and it needs more space (to store the extra pointer).
What are the application of singly linked list?
A singly-linked list is ideally suited to stacks (last in, first out). The list maintains a link with the head node in the list and each node points to the next node in the list (the last node points to NULL). When a new node is added it is added to the head of the list. Since enqueue and dequeue both occur at the head of the list, processing is always in constant time [O(1)]. With slight modification (maintaining a pointer to the tail node as well as the head), singly-linked lists can also be used for queues (first in first out). Processing remains constant time [O(1)]. However, random access and search are both linear [O(n/2) and O(n) respectively]. While the list can be modified to maintain a sorted list, insert and seek times still average [O(n/2)].
How many pointers will have to be changed if a node is deleted from a linear linked list?
For a singly-linked list, only one pointer must be changed. If the node about to be deleted (let's call it node for the sake of argument) is the head of the list, then the head node pointer must be changed to node->next. Otherwise, the node that comes before the deleted node must change its next pointer to node->next. Note that given a singly-linked node has no knowledge of its previous node, we must traverse the list from the head in order to locate that particular node, unless the node is the head of the list: void remove (List* list, Node* node) { if (!list !node) return; // sanity check!if (list->head == node) {list->head = node->next;} else {Node* prev = list->head;while (prev->next != node) prev = prev->next; // locate the node's previous nodeprev->next = node->next;}} Note that the remove function only removes the node from the list, it does not delete it. This allows us to restore the node to its original position, because the node itself was never modified (and thus still refers to its next node in the list). So long as we restore all removed nodes in the reverse order they were removed, we can easily restore the list. In order to delete a node completely, we simply remove it and then free it:void delete (List* list, Node* node) {if (!list !node) return; // sanity check!remove (list, node);free (node);} For a doubly-linked list, either two or four pointers must be changed. If the node about to be deleted is the head node, then the head node pointer must be changed to n->next and n->next->prev must be changed to NULL, otherwise, n->prev->next becomes n->next. In addition, if the node about to be deleted is the tail node, then the tail node pointer must be changed to n->prev and n->prev->next must be changed to NULL, otherwise, n->next->prev becomes n->prev. Deletion from a doubly-linked list is generally quicker than deletion from a singly linked list because a node in a doubly-linked list knows both its previous node and its next node, so there's no need to traverse the list to locate the previous node to the one being deleted. void remove (List* list, Node* node) {if (!list !node) return; // sanity check!if (list->head == node) {list->head = node->next;node->next->prev = NULL;} else {node->prev->next = node->next; }if (list->tail == node) {list->tail = node->prev;node->prev->next = NULL;} else {node->next->prev = node->prev; }} Again, to physically delete the node we simply remove and then free the node:void delete (List* list, Node* node) {if (!list !node) return; // sanity check!remove (list, node); free (node); }
what are the differences between singly link list and doubly link list?
singly linked list stores only the address of next node while doubly linked list stores the address of previous node and next node and hence it is called doubly linked list. In singly linked list only forward traversing is possible while in doubly linked list forward and backward traversal is possible.
How do you implement a doubly linked list by using singly linked list?
Add another pointer to the nodes for the previous node: struct node { struct node *next; struct node *previous; void *data; }; typedef struct node node; Then change the logic for insertion and removal to make sure you set the previous pointer as well as the next one.
What is difference between linked list and singly linked list?
Answersingly linked list has the node inserted only at one end. and the pointer corresponds to the next pointer.but in a doubly linked list, the node pointer points to the both previous and the next node.singly linked list has two nodesdoubly linked list has three nodesA doubly linked list makes sense when you need to traverse the list in both directions. You aren't able to do that with a singly linked list.
What operation is supported in constant time by the doubly linked list but not by the singly linked list?
examples:- delete this node (identified by a pointer)- insert a new node before this node- replace this node with another node
What are the differences between singly-linked doubly-linked and circularly-linked lists?
The difference is how many pointers each node has, and what they are pointing to. A linked list is comprised of "Nodes" each node contains data as well as 1 or more pointers. A singly linked list has one pointer per node, and a doubly linked list has 2 pointers per node. Some programs use several pointers per node. The purpose of these pointers is to hold the list together. In a singly linked list, you can view a node and can then move on to the next node that it is pointing to until you've passed through them all. A doubly-linked list would have a pointer to the next node as well as to the previous node. Thus you can move forward and backward through the list. A circularly-linked list doesn't necessarily have a set number of pointers because it simply means that the last node points to the first node creating a big circle. A non-circularly-linked list would not contain this last to first pointer and thus you would eventually reach the end of the list and stop.
What is singly linked list and doubly linked list?
Singly Linked list Each item in the list is called a node and contains two fields  Information field - The information field holds the actual elements in the list  Next address field- The next address field contains the address of the next node in the list. The entire linked list is accessed from an external pointer called the List. Doubly linked list is a collection of node. Each node contains three fields an info field that contains the information stored in the node. The left and right field that contains the address of the node on its left and right. The doubly linked list could be linear, circular and may have a header node.
What are the disadvatages of singly linked list?
You may only traverse the linked list in one direction, and unless the linked list is also circular, you must always start from the root node and walk through each additional node until you find the desired value.
What is the advantage of doubly linked list over Doubly linked list?
A doubly linked list can be traversed in both directions (forward and backward). A singly linked list can only be traversed in one direction. A node on a doubly linked list may be deleted with little trouble, since we have pointers to the previous and next nodes. A node on a singly linked list cannot be removed unless we have the pointer to its predecessor. On the flip side however, a doubly linked list needs more operations while inserting or deleting and it needs more space (to store the extra pointer).
What are the application of singly linked list?
A singly-linked list is ideally suited to stacks (last in, first out). The list maintains a link with the head node in the list and each node points to the next node in the list (the last node points to NULL). When a new node is added it is added to the head of the list. Since enqueue and dequeue both occur at the head of the list, processing is always in constant time [O(1)]. With slight modification (maintaining a pointer to the tail node as well as the head), singly-linked lists can also be used for queues (first in first out). Processing remains constant time [O(1)]. However, random access and search are both linear [O(n/2) and O(n) respectively]. While the list can be modified to maintain a sorted list, insert and seek times still average [O(n/2)].
Common operation of singly linked list?
Common operations on a singly linked list include insertion (at the beginning, end, or specific position), deletion (from the beginning, end, or specific position), traversal (visiting each node in the list), searching (finding a specific value), and updating (modifying the value of a node).
How the singly Linked List related with Circular Linked List?
With a singly linked list you will typically maintain a pointer to the head node and perform all insertions and extractions at the head because it is the only node you have constant time access to. If you need to insert at the tail node as well then you must maintain a separate pointer to the tail. You would typically do this to implement a queue (first in, first out), where all insertions occur at the tail and all extractions at the head. But with a circular linked list, the tail node points to the head node thus you no longer need to maintain a separate pointer to the head in order to implement a queue, you only need to maintain a pointer to the tail.
How many pointers will have to be changed if a node is deleted from a linear linked list?
For a singly-linked list, only one pointer must be changed. If the node about to be deleted (let's call it node for the sake of argument) is the head of the list, then the head node pointer must be changed to node->next. Otherwise, the node that comes before the deleted node must change its next pointer to node->next. Note that given a singly-linked node has no knowledge of its previous node, we must traverse the list from the head in order to locate that particular node, unless the node is the head of the list: void remove (List* list, Node* node) { if (!list !node) return; // sanity check!if (list->head == node) {list->head = node->next;} else {Node* prev = list->head;while (prev->next != node) prev = prev->next; // locate the node's previous nodeprev->next = node->next;}} Note that the remove function only removes the node from the list, it does not delete it. This allows us to restore the node to its original position, because the node itself was never modified (and thus still refers to its next node in the list). So long as we restore all removed nodes in the reverse order they were removed, we can easily restore the list. In order to delete a node completely, we simply remove it and then free it:void delete (List* list, Node* node) {if (!list !node) return; // sanity check!remove (list, node);free (node);} For a doubly-linked list, either two or four pointers must be changed. If the node about to be deleted is the head node, then the head node pointer must be changed to n->next and n->next->prev must be changed to NULL, otherwise, n->prev->next becomes n->next. In addition, if the node about to be deleted is the tail node, then the tail node pointer must be changed to n->prev and n->prev->next must be changed to NULL, otherwise, n->next->prev becomes n->prev. Deletion from a doubly-linked list is generally quicker than deletion from a singly linked list because a node in a doubly-linked list knows both its previous node and its next node, so there's no need to traverse the list to locate the previous node to the one being deleted. void remove (List* list, Node* node) {if (!list !node) return; // sanity check!if (list->head == node) {list->head = node->next;node->next->prev = NULL;} else {node->prev->next = node->next; }if (list->tail == node) {list->tail = node->prev;node->prev->next = NULL;} else {node->next->prev = node->prev; }} Again, to physically delete the node we simply remove and then free the node:void delete (List* list, Node* node) {if (!list !node) return; // sanity check!remove (list, node); free (node); }
