Both, for many reasons he was good and for many reasons he was bad. There is no real answer for this, it is only a matter of opinion. If you know quite a few of the things he has done in his life you can then make up your mind on whether you think he is a good person or not.
the invention can be useful in the hands of a good person, but it can be harmful in the hands of a bad person.
A genuine, good person believes that God created him or her, and they believe that God is One and has no partners. So they don't say that anyone is like God in anyway. They admit and acknowledge what they are. We are simply creations in need of our Creator every second. There are two kinds of people: Good guys and Bad guys. The genuine person asks God to make him or her one of the good guys. And the good guys do fight the bad guys, but some times in very subtle positively clever ways. aicp
good
no.
For an 8 ohm speaker, 8 ohms is perfect. "Good" and "bad" are relative to the application.
he was rude to others when they are talking ignoring them. He also raped a chicken
both
Richard Bosley has written: 'On good and bad' -- subject(s): Good and evil, Happiness
Changes are good for a person, unless the changes are not good changes... then, changes are bad for a person. If you support bad changes then you would be supporting bad change for a person.
Good in a bad way.
He was a GOOD person
good person
Socrates was a good person but a lot of people thought he was a bad person
There is saying " by their fruits you know them". To spot a good or bad person watch their actions.
bad
he was a bad person but, did very few good things
Richard Arkwright, an 18th-century inventor and entrepreneur, is often viewed through a complex lens. While he played a pivotal role in the Industrial Revolution with his innovations in textile manufacturing, his business practices included harsh working conditions and the exploitation of labor, particularly of children. Some may argue that his contributions to industry and technology outweighed his ethical shortcomings, while others criticize him for prioritizing profit over worker welfare. Ultimately, whether he is deemed a "bad man" depends on the perspective one takes regarding the balance of his achievements and the social consequences of his actions.