This would depend entirely on how the stem cells were harvested.
Buddhists generally operate under the precept that one should live without desire and that doing harm to another living thing was morally wrong, unless absolutely necessary (as in the case of self-defense).
So, if a fetus (as one example) were killed solely for the harvesting of stem cells, the buddhists (and most people) would naturally be against it. However, if the fetus died naturally, or from some other cause (say, elective abortion) and the body of the fetus were then harvested for stem cells, there would be no reason to object to stem cell research itself.
And since there are now at least half a dozen ways in which stem cells can be harvested from a variety of sources, all of which are non-destructive (including fat from Liposuction) the objection to stem cell research at all.
I think it's called recombinant technology
Cloning of animals is legal, but cloning of humans is considered to be a taboo and is not legal.
It will solve the problem of so many people be fat asses in the USA
genetic engineering is a way of intentionally going a genetic sequence in DNA so that a particular traits is produced. that what a genetics engineering. but did u know that herb Boyer first transferred DNA from one species to another.so that whats about genetic engineering. Next, i'm going to talk about is that genetcs engineering.it can haelp spociety is humanbeings living and acting together.
Genetic engineering is often used in plants (especially plants that provide humans with food) so that the food/fruit/nut/product is bigger, better, and shinier. Genetic engineering can also change the DNA so that a plant can be immune to diseases (or at least fight them) and make them more resilient to heat/drought/cold.
I think it's called recombinant technology
genetic engineering, i think there are so many potential dangerous.
Certainly all Buddhists do not believe this. There may be some Japanese Buddhists who think this.
i dont really know
Human cloning and animal cloning both involve creating a genetic copy of an organism, but there are differences in the ethical and legal considerations surrounding each. Human cloning raises complex ethical issues related to human rights and medical ethics, while animal cloning is primarily focused on agricultural and scientific applications. Additionally, the technologies and procedures used for human cloning may differ from those used for animal cloning.
I think cloning research shouldn't be regulated because cloning can be harmful to the world. Also cloning can have advantages and some disadvantages.
Well, it's an ethics question really. There are no real physical disadvantages. (Unless you engineer everyone to be the same, then we can't evolve and become dependant on cloning and genetic engineering to be able to breed and stay one step ahead of viruses) There are alot of disadvantages...like people can make clones without heads so they couldn't breathe, people can make them smater, more athletic, and sexier than normal people. Everyone will soon be the same and there will be no job oppertunites because anyone will be just like everyone else. Some scientists even think that the clones will age quicker too. Plus Genetic Engineering is against God's will, it's unnantural, and it crosses the species barrier.
suffering
Cloning of animals is legal, but cloning of humans is considered to be a taboo and is not legal.
A clone.
Cloning is beneficial when an animal species or other organism species is becoming extinct. By cloning them, there will be more of them now, and enough of them to reproduce and naturally restore the population.
It is one of many spiritual paths. Buddhists do not believe there is only one legitimate spiritual path.