There is no real need for robots. However, they do make many people's lives easier, and have enabled humans to do things they never could have done without robots.
there could be a Robots 2 maybe coming out in 2015.
I think robots could take over the universe
No, robots are not "smart." Robots do the actions they were programmed to do by a human. While there have been programs created to help robots "learn," these are still limited by the overall software they carry.It is not possible for a digital entity to ever become smarter than the entity who programs it.No. Humans only use 15% of there brains. Robots are much smarter. They are like super computers.You could say Half and half really.A robot is really very intelligent but some things a robot can't do.But most of stuff it can do.
AnswerRobots and machines can accomplish complicated or enormous projects more precisely than humans can. Robots- sometimes called "artificial intellegence" do many things faster than humans, and make everyday life safer. For example- The military has begun to use robots in the warzones. Robots make everyday life more enjoyable. And refering back to the robots in warzones- the people who are fighting them won't know where to shoot them- and are intimidated and surrender.
There is no real need for robots. However, they do make many people's lives easier, and have enabled humans to do things they never could have done without robots.
To give movies a more scientific feel or to make people wonder if robots could actually be used instead of humans which is what is happening at the moment in factories.
The main idea was showing people the main relations between humans and robots (technic). In some cases robots could be realy helpfull, in some other cases - not at all
we humans can see more and understand more than robots or computers can. we can adapt and basically they can't
Most jobs that currently can be replaced by computers alone have been. Numerous other jobs that could be replaced so, would also require the computer to have artificial intelligence and the ability to rationalise as humans do. The unlikelihod of this means it probably won't occur in the conceivably near-future.Jobs that can be replaced by computers in conjunction with other tools such as robots include manufacture and primary sector jobs, such as farming and processing. Many tertiary sector jobs could also theoretically be replaced by them, such as accounting, receptionist, diagnostic and consultancy services.
Papero robots are not for sale.
Robots are often sent into space instead of humans because they can withstand extreme conditions better and do not require life support systems. They can also perform repetitive or dangerous tasks without risking human lives. Additionally, robots can be more cost-effective for missions that don't require human presence.
Computers and robots are inorganic, so they could indeed exist. the question is whether or not computers and robots could have come about in a universe that is inorganic.
there could be a Robots 2 maybe coming out in 2015.
One hopes you're aware that Karel Capek was a writer, and RUR was a play, and no "robots" were actually built.Capek's "robots" (from a Czech word meaning "worker" or "slave") were not what modern people would think of when they hear the word "robot". The Rossum universal robots were pretty much indistinguishable from humans (or, at worst, from humans wearing make-up) so that the ones that are important to the story could be played by humans wearing make-up. Today, we'd probably call them "androids" or "synthetic humanoids" rather than robots.
I think robots could take over the universe
Robots are used in the industry as they excel at tasks that are repetitive, boring or dangerous to do. They can reduce the cost of manufacturing, finish their tasks efficiently and standardize all goods to a high quality. The hazards involved in dangerous tasks, such as handling toxic chemicals, could also be avoided with the aid of robots. Humans could also avoid daunting tasks that may result in strains and tiredness.