There are a great many sorts, Mergesort and Quicksort being among the most popular. These both have on the order of n*log n expected case runtime, and while Quicksort can get as bad as n^2, this is unlikely due to most implementations using a random pivot.
If you can make the assumption that ONLY NUMBERS will be sorted, you can use RadixSort, which is the fastest known sort for numbers.
As for how to sort in particular programming languages, consult your local API (in C++ it is in the STL's "algorithm" include file).
On average merge sort is more efficient however insertion sort could potentially be faster. As a result it depends how close to reverse order the data is. If it is likely to be mostly sorted, insertion sort is faster, if not, merge sort is faster.
quick sort
There is no worst case for merge sort. Each sort takes the same amount of steps, so the worst case is equal to the average case and best case. In each case it has a complexity of O( N * log(N) ).
Although bubble sort is one of the simplest sorting algorithms to understand and implement, its O(n2)complexity means it is far too inefficient for use on lists having more than a few elements. Even among simple O(n2)sorting algorithms, algorithms like insertion sort are usually considerably more efficient.
You can sort an ArrayList by using the sort method of the Collecions class (java.util.Collections). Assuming you have an ArrayList called foo: Collections.sort(foo);
Quick sort is more efficient for large datasets compared to selection sort.
Selection sort is more efficient for small datasets compared to bubble sort.
The best sorting algorithm to use for an almost sorted array is Insertion Sort. It is efficient for nearly sorted arrays because it only requires a small number of comparisons and swaps to sort the elements.
An overshot was the olderst most efficient one.
Some examples of pseudocode for sorting algorithms include Bubble Sort, Selection Sort, and Merge Sort. These algorithms differ in terms of efficiency and implementation. Bubble Sort is simple but less efficient for large datasets. Selection Sort is also simple but more efficient than Bubble Sort. Merge Sort is more complex but highly efficient for large datasets due to its divide-and-conquer approach.
On average merge sort is more efficient however insertion sort could potentially be faster. As a result it depends how close to reverse order the data is. If it is likely to be mostly sorted, insertion sort is faster, if not, merge sort is faster.
The best case scenario for the Bubble Sort algorithm is when the input data is already sorted. In this case, the algorithm will only need to make one pass through the data to confirm that it is sorted, resulting in a time complexity of O(n). This makes it efficient and fast for sorting already sorted data.
It depends entirely upon what sort of website you're looking for. There is on one "best" webpage out there.
Yes, Merge Sort is generally faster than Insertion Sort for sorting large datasets due to its more efficient divide-and-conquer approach.
For small datasets, insertion sort is generally more efficient than quicksort. This is because insertion sort has a lower overhead and performs well on small lists due to its simplicity and low time complexity.
Sauerbraten (Best one) Cube (same as the one above, sort of) That's about it, but Sauerbraten is the best game I have ever played.
Advantages:Easy to implementIn-place sort (requires no additional storage space)Disadvantages:Doesn't scale well: O(n2)