no actually dc current is more dangerous than ac because dc is a direct current and has no current zero condition ,which is very dangerous and do not leave us if we get shock while ac current leave us when we get shock
Alternating current is more efficinent. It is wireless and more efficient than direct current. And it is safer. Plus Tesla is better than Edison
Both will kill you easily ;) But medium/high voltage, high current DC is generally considered 'more dangerous' as it tends to make people clamp onto the cable rather than being thrown away from it, so fault current is suffered for longer as a result. Hope this helps. Paul. ANSWER : NOT TRUE VOLTAGE DOES NOT KILL current however will even a 'D' cell can kill you [able to deliver 2 amps] Now which is more dangerous DC for sure it is continuous AC WILL PASS TROUGH ZERO AT TIMES ENOUGH MAYBE TO DISCONNECT
ANSWER:- Kouwenhoven's factors: AC changes direction frequently; it is the current usually supplied by household electrical outlets in the US and Europe. DC flows in the same direction constantly; it is the current supplied by batteries. Defibrillators and cardioverters usually deliver DC current. How AC affects the body depends largely on frequency. Low-frequency (50- to 60-Hz) AC is used in US (60 Hz) and European (50 Hz) households; it can be more dangerous than high-frequency AC and is 3 to 5 times more dangerous than DC of the same voltage and amperage. Low-frequency AC produces extended muscle contraction (tetany), which may freeze the hand to the current's source, prolonging exposure. DC is most likely to cause a single convulsive contraction, which often forces the victim away from the current's source. As per IEEE std. 80 as well..... let go current is 16mA for AC and 75mA for DC.... So there is nothing like AC will throw you off and DC will hold you off.... Question itself wrong....
You can block AC current by using a filter with a pass-band that is outside the frequency of the AC current.
A "Rectifier" converts AC current to pulsating DC current.
AC (alternating current) is generally considered more dangerous than DC (direct current) when it comes to electrical shocks. This is because AC can cause muscles to contract and prevent a person from letting go of the source of the shock, leading to more severe injuries.
AC (alternating current) is generally considered more dangerous than DC (direct current) in terms of potential harm to humans and property. This is because AC can cause muscle contractions and fibrillation at lower levels of exposure compared to DC.
Edison tried to prove that alternating current (AC) was dangerous by publicly electrocuting animals with AC currents. He held demonstrations where he electrocuted animals, such as cats and dogs, to show that AC current was more lethal than his preferred direct current (DC). This was part of his campaign to discredit AC and promote DC as the safer option for electrical distribution.
either one, neither one
AC current is generally considered more dangerous in terms of electrical safety compared to DC current. This is because AC current can cause muscles to contract involuntarily, making it harder to let go of a live wire, while DC current typically causes a single muscle contraction.
Both AC and DC electrical currents can be dangerous, but AC is generally considered to be more dangerous than DC. This is because AC can cause muscles to contract involuntarily, making it harder for a person to let go of a live wire. DC, on the other hand, typically causes a single muscle contraction, making it easier for a person to release the source of the shock.
yes it is 230 v is deadly, it doesn't matter if it's ac or dc. Some people say one is more dangerous than the other. That implies that there is some voltage, lower than 230 v, at which one will kill you but the other will not. There is no conclusive evidence for that, so it can't be said that ac is more dangerous than dc or vice versa.
I am not 100% sure but I think DC is more dangerous than AC.Both are dangerous. It is difficult to put numbers on it, as there are too many variables which determine the amount of current which flows through you when you get a shock. There is only one safe course when dealing with electricity, and that is to assume it is always dangerous and always avoid touching anything live.
AC current is generally considered more dangerous in terms of electrical safety compared to DC current. This is because AC current can cause muscles to contract involuntarily, making it more likely for a person to be unable to let go of a live conductor. DC current, on the other hand, typically causes muscles to contract and then release, which may allow a person to let go of the conductor more easily.
AC is more dangerous than DC because it can cause muscle contractions and fibrillation at lower levels of voltage, making it more likely to disrupt the heart's normal rhythm and potentially lead to serious injury or death.
DC direct current is be coming more popular than AC alternating current AC is not really suitable for some devices maybe your device is needing low current
Alternating current is more efficinent. It is wireless and more efficient than direct current. And it is safer. Plus Tesla is better than Edison