0
Write a c program to remove a specified node from a given doubly linked list and insert it at the end of the list?
#include<stdio.h>
#include<stdlib.h>
#define NULL 0
struct info
{
int info;
struct info *next;
struct info *prev;
};
struct info *start,*end;
void main()
{
struct info *ptr;
if(start==NULL)
{
printf("linklist is empty");
}
else
{
ptr=(struct info *)malloc(sizeof(struct info));
ptr=start;
if(start==end)
{
start=NULL;
end=NULL;
}
else
{
start=start->next;
start->prev=NULL;
}
free(ptr);
}
}
What else can I help you with?
Convert single linked list to double linked list?
You copy a singly linked list into a doubly linked list by iterating over the singly linked list and, for each element, calling the doubly linked list insert function.
Does each node in a doubly linked list contain a link to the previous as well as the next node?
Yes, each node in a doubly linked list contain a link to the previous as well as the next node. That is the definition of the doubly linked list.
What operation is supported in constant time by the doubly linked list but not by the singly linked list?
examples:- delete this node (identified by a pointer)- insert a new node before this node- replace this node with another node
What is best and worst case of time complexity and space complexity of insert and delete operation in singly linked list doubly linked list?
When inserting or extracting at the end of a singly-linked list or at the beginning or end of a doubly-linked list, the complexity is constant time. Inserting or extracting in the middle of a list has linear complexity, with best case O(1) when the insertion or extraction point is already known in advance and a worst case of O(n) when it is not.
Why you use doubly link list?
In a doubly linked list, you can iterate backwards as easily as forwards, as each element contains links to both the prior and the following element. You can also insert or delete an element without needing to iterate and remember the prior element's link. This comes at a cost. You are adding storage to each element for the second link, and you are adding processing overhead to the insert and delete operation. You have to determine the tradeoff.
Convert single linked list to double linked list?
You copy a singly linked list into a doubly linked list by iterating over the singly linked list and, for each element, calling the doubly linked list insert function.
Does each node in a doubly linked list contain a link to the previous as well as the next node?
Yes, each node in a doubly linked list contain a link to the previous as well as the next node. That is the definition of the doubly linked list.
What operation is supported in constant time by the doubly linked list but not by the singly linked list?
examples:- delete this node (identified by a pointer)- insert a new node before this node- replace this node with another node
what are the differences between singly link list and doubly link list?
singly linked list stores only the address of next node while doubly linked list stores the address of previous node and next node and hence it is called doubly linked list. In singly linked list only forward traversing is possible while in doubly linked list forward and backward traversal is possible.
C program to implement deque using circular linked list?
You'll need to use a doubly-linked circular list, since otherwise when you pop off the tail element you'll need to whizz all the way round the list to find its predecessor. See the links section for an implementation of a doubly-linked circular list.
What is best and worst case of time complexity and space complexity of insert and delete operation in singly linked list doubly linked list?
When inserting or extracting at the end of a singly-linked list or at the beginning or end of a doubly-linked list, the complexity is constant time. Inserting or extracting in the middle of a list has linear complexity, with best case O(1) when the insertion or extraction point is already known in advance and a worst case of O(n) when it is not.
Why you use doubly link list?
In a doubly linked list, you can iterate backwards as easily as forwards, as each element contains links to both the prior and the following element. You can also insert or delete an element without needing to iterate and remember the prior element's link. This comes at a cost. You are adding storage to each element for the second link, and you are adding processing overhead to the insert and delete operation. You have to determine the tradeoff.
Write a algorithm for doubly linked list in c?
sorry
How can a binary tree be converted into a doubly linked list?
To convert a binary tree into a doubly linked list, perform an in-order traversal of the tree and adjust the pointers to create the doubly linked list. This involves setting the left child pointer to the previous node and the right child pointer to the next node in the list.
How can you efficiently sort a doubly linked list?
To efficiently sort a doubly linked list, you can use a sorting algorithm such as merge sort or quicksort. These algorithms can be implemented to work with doubly linked lists by considering the pointers in both directions. By recursively dividing the list and merging or partitioning the elements, you can achieve an efficient sorting process.
Which operation is perform more efficiently by doubly linked list than by single linked list?
zsd
What is the difference between doubly linked list and circular linked list?
A doubly linked list is a linked list in which each node knows where both of its neighbors are.A circular linked list is a linked list in which the "tail" of the list is linked to the "root". (Note that both the tail and root of the list are undefined/arbitrary in a circular linked list)Doubly linked lists are actually not necessarily related to circular linked list (aside from both being based on a linked list structure). In fact, you can have a circular doubly linked list, where each node knows where both of its neighbors are andwhere the list wraps around to connect to itself.
