answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

All sources, whether primary or secondary, need to be assessed for reliability. Please also note that the term primary source is not absolute or fixed. For example, there is a significant difference between accounts written at the time and an autobiography written in some cases decades after the events that it describes. You need to ask questions like: * Who wrote it? Why, when, where? * Did the author have first hand knowledge of the events described? If not, how did he or she get the information? (For example, does the source merely repeat stories that cirulated widely at the time?) * What is the author's point of view? Is there evidence of bias? These are just some of the more obvious general questions that one needs to ask. Of course in many cases there may not be any simple answers.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Are primary sources reliable
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Do you think primary sources or secondary sources are more valuable to modern historians and why?

Primary sources are more valuable to modern historians because they are more reliable.


How to find good primary sources?

What are some good reliable primary resources can you find on Jean Paul Marat


What advantages do primary sources have over secondary sources?

Primary sources provide firsthand accounts or direct evidence of events, while secondary sources interpret or analyze information provided by primary sources. Primary sources are often more reliable and can provide unique perspectives that may not be found in secondary sources. They can offer a deeper understanding of historical events or issues.


Is secondary sources are easier to find than primary sources to evaluated integrity?

Secondary sources are generally easier to find than primary sources because they summarize or analyze information from primary sources. However, in terms of evaluating integrity, primary sources are generally considered more reliable as they provide firsthand information without interpretation or bias that may be present in secondary sources.


Why would it be wrong to think that primary sources are more reliable than secondary sources?

While primary sources are valuable for firsthand accounts, they can still be biased or incomplete. Secondary sources provide analysis and interpretation of primary sources, offering a broader perspective. It's essential to consider multiple sources to gain a comprehensive understanding of a topic.


What is a biography that deals with only factual information and in which everything not backed by reliable primary sources is discarded?

Authentic Biography


When was Reliable Sources created?

Reliable Sources was created in 1992.


Is wwwanswerscom a reliable source for research?

The web can to direct you to primary sources, but it is not one. You may safely use it as a starting point.


A biography that deals with only factual information and in which everything not backed by reliable primary sources is discarded is called?

authentic biography


What are two possible problems a researcher should be aware of when using primary sources?

Two possible problems that a researcher should be aware of when using primary sources are bias and authenticity. Primary sources can be biased based on the perspective of the author or creator, so researchers should critically evaluate the information presented. Additionally, researchers should confirm the authenticity of primary sources to ensure that they are trustworthy and reliable for their research purposes.


What While some primary sources are considered more reliable than others consider that every source is in some way.?

biased :


While some primary sources are considered more reliable than others consider that every source is in some way?

biased