answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about English Language Arts

A syllogism includes two premises and what else?

A syllogism includes two premises and a conclusion. The premises take the form of statement about classes of things and the conclusion is a similar statement which is necessarily implied by the premises.


What is deductively valid argument?

A deductively valid argument is if the premises are true then the conclusion is certainly true, not possibly true. The definition does not say that the conclusion is true.


What is the definition of the word 'premises' and an example of it in a sentence?

Premises has two definitions:Premises can refer to a house or building, along with its land and outbuildings, usually occupied by a business or being used for a formal or official purpose.'Alcohol was not to be served on the premises during the party.'A premise refers to a statement or proposition which is followed by a form of conclusion.'The premise was followed by an affirmative conclusion.'


How do you test an enthymeme for validity?

Although there is some disagreement about the precise rules for a valid syllogism --particularly about the "existential" requirement -- there is general agreement on some tests. To test the validity of an enthymeme, fill in the missing premise, then examine the premises and the conclusion. Max Black (Critical Thinking) listed eight rules for a valid syllogism. Irving Copi (Introduction to Logic) reduced them to six:1. It must have three, and only three, unambiguous categorical terms.2. The middle term must be distributed at least once.3. If either the major or the minor term is distributed in the premises, it must be distributed in the conclusion.4. Two negative premises yield no valid conclusion.5. If one of the premises is negative, then the conclusion must be negative.6. Two particular premises yield no valid conclusion.


What is an invalid argument?

In invalid argument is one in which the premises do not necessitate the truth of the conclusion. An argument's validity or invalidity does NOT depend on the actual truth of the premises, just what they would entail IF they are true.

Related Questions

Assuming there are premises based on correct observations and sound logic which is more certain of resulting in a conclusion that's correct?

Deductive reasoning


What is the conclusion that can be drawn if all the premises of an argument are true?

If all the premises of an argument are true, then the conclusion drawn from those premises is likely to be valid and logically sound.


How do you add a premises and conclusion to incomplete argument?

To add a premises and conclusion to an incomplete argument, first identify the main point being made. Then, find additional supporting reasons or evidence that lead to that main point to form the premises. Finally, state a clear conclusion that follows logically from the premises provided. Make sure the premises adequately support the conclusion for a strong and coherent argument.


A syllogism includes two premises and what else?

A syllogism includes two premises and a conclusion. The premises take the form of statement about classes of things and the conclusion is a similar statement which is necessarily implied by the premises.


Is an argument valid or invalid?

An argument is valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises. It is invalid if the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises.


Describe a conclusion reached from observations?

A "conjecture" is a conclusion reached simply from observations...this is a process known as "inductive reasoning". An example would be a weather forecast. The difference between "inductive reasoning" and "deductive reasoning" is that with deductive reasoning, the answer must "necessarily" follow from a set of premises. Inductive reasoning is the process by which you make a mathematical "hypothesis" given a set of observations


Do the premises sufficiently support the conclusions?

This depends on the specific premises and conclusion being evaluated. In general, premises that provide strong and relevant evidence in support of the conclusion can be considered sufficient. However, if there are logical gaps or missing information in the premises that weaken the connection to the conclusion, then the premises may not be sufficient. Critical analysis is necessary to determine whether the premises adequately support the conclusion.


A valid argument can have a false conclusion True or False?

True. - Valid arguments are deductive. - Arguments are valid if the premises lead to the conclusion without committing a fallacy. - If an argument is valid, that means that if the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true. - This means that a valid argument with a false premise can lead to a false conclusion. This is called a valid, unsound argument. - A valid, sound argument would be when, if the premises are true the conclusion must be true and the premises are true.


What is deductive argument?

A deductive argument is and argument that the premises are claimed to give sufficient support for the conclusion to follow. The premises are repeated in the conclusion. Often the conclusion does not have any new information. eg The moon is circular when it is full the moon is circular therefore the moon is full.


What is a logical conclusion derived from premises known or assumed to be true?

A logical conclusion is a statement that can be inferred from the premises based on the rules of logic. It is the result of applying deductive reasoning to ensure that if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true.


Is a logical conclusion derived from premises known or assumed to be true?

generaliztion


What makes a valid deductive argument?

A valid deductive argument is one where the conclusion logically follows from the premises. In other words, if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. The form of the argument must be such that it is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false.