answersLogoWhite

0

In invalid argument is one in which the premises do not necessitate the truth of the conclusion. An argument's validity or invalidity does NOT depend on the actual truth of the premises, just what they would entail IF they are true.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is the difference between a valid or invalid argument?

An invalid argument is when the facts you are using are invalid or your forms of defense are wrong or incorrect, a valid argument is the opposite of an invalid argument. "There is a windmill in my beard. your argument is invalid." (This is a good example of a bad contradiction)


Is the argument denying the antecedent valid or invalid?

The argument denying the antecedent is invalid.


Why cant you have an argument which is invalid and sound?

An argument that is invalid is one where the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises. A sound argument is one that is valid and has true premises. So, by definition, an argument cannot be both invalid and sound at the same time because for an argument to be sound it must be valid.


What makes a valid argument invalid?

A valid argument becomes invalid when it contains a logical fallacy, such as a false premise or faulty reasoning. Additionally, if the conclusion does not necessarily follow from the premises provided, the argument is considered invalid.


Is an argument valid or invalid?

An argument is valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises. It is invalid if the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises.


What does so do in Spanish?

your argument is invalid


Can an argument be invalid and sound?

No, but it can be unsound and valid.


What word means illogical argument?

Invalid.


What is theWord for a plausible argument that is invalid and misleading?

sophism


Is the Liverpool are the best?

STOKE is the best your argument is invalid


Can an argument with a tautologous conclusion be considered invalid?

Yes, an argument with a tautologous conclusion can be considered invalid because it does not provide any new information or reasoning to support its conclusion.


What is the part of an argument that is flawed and makes the argument invalid an error in reasoning?

That would be a moot point